You talking about this one? I just wanted to make sure I didn't miss out on anything.
2 different forms of worship of old "gods". And yes, Q did say the "end" won't be for everyone, so there will be some difficult truths left for individuals to discover on their own. That doesn't mean it won't be defeated. What it means is there will be no martyrs for their side. However you need to work that out in your perceptions, assumptions, or fact-based research is on you. The drop with proper context is attached. If you are needing inspiration outside of the "supernatural", then I would recommend you look into classic humanism. It has a general morality that might allow you to find a greater purpose in your existence, here, and also help to give some inspiration in the goodness of others, and hope in humanity without the need to compromise your insistent denial of a greater source of it all.
Back to your post. Many anons have already been exposed to enough of the truth to connect all the dots necessary. A bunch of dumb fucks using pedophilia as the entry fee to the secure club appear to have actually bought into meme "gods" to worship because they felt it was those (non existent) gods that gave them their wordly powers/wealth/prowess. It also provided them a system to help with their own "longevity". You can think of God however you wish; not here to get into a debate. But I will point out the obvious Truth:
If, IF you are correct about God, then that means these elites really are the dumbest fucking people on the planet because they either used a occultist belief system to justify being nihilists, or they were nihilists seeking vindication for their own self-importance. Their time and grasp over the public consciousness has finally come to an end, and not a moment too soon. They were doing everything they could to ease the public into that mindset with all their devices and distractions.
-Break-
I would strongly encourage you to take a step back and think about your real purpose, here. Take a moment to contextualize your efforts in their expected results. If you are being destructive or demoralizing with the hope that you would influence others down this path, you've come to the wrong place, fren.
Good for this anon my relationship is intact, and negates their search for conscientious dominance. Not to mention that sometimes replying to those types of posts might be a lampstand for those newly exposed to these types of tactics.
All this really means is it's Parag's time in the spotlight. No need to make this complicated.
Asking the right question, anon.
>not to be bound by the First Amendment
This is the most inverse, idiotic, and moranic statement I've seen in at least 1 day.