As we watch old putrid names fade out they have putrid children and proteges to take their places
constantly devising new ways to hide their wiles
and maleficence.
How is cancer removed?
What Happens When the Government Breaks Its Own Laws?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/what-happens-when-government-breaks-own-laws/5763345
Kings of the East prophecy building up?
Gog and Magog
Russia, China Poised to Forge Alliance
https://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-china-poised-forge-alliance/5763341
Putin says Russia has no concerns over China’s growing defense potential
https://tass.com/politics/1368773
Last ditch efforts to cull the weak minded.
What if was already extremely weird but many are just figuring out and scratching the surface of the first stage of understanding?
What if it is only now being rapidly released to the gen public because it was tested, perfected and implemented in clandestine ways long ago?
better link perhaps
https://ia601608.us.archive.org/14/items/in.ernet.dli.2015.207839/2015.207839.That-Hideous.pdf
What does that say about our IQ for allowing her to stay in that position for so long?
Regardless of Q or a plan…what does it say?
You may have missed the point and then you may want to consider the body politic that runs that context of laws.
The question will again come full circle.
Argumentation will begin within oneself until context first and then fact achieved.
Carrying a banner is wonderful, we just need to understand why.
Right over wrong, light over dark, good over evil always.
Our ignorance, mine included, yes IQ, reverse those effects.
"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected knowledge, I also will reject you from being priests for Me; Because you have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children."
We will get there together but we must make every effort to not be offended by the hard reality of truth.
We are allowing these things to take place.
In this world of hard scrutiny, I hope you can see past the 'our IQ' and grab the context of what is being stated.
Some do and some do not.
I often miss this very same thing.
To be blunt, we allowed and are allowing this.
Perhaps it is a wrongfully back-handed approach at saying stay in the fight and let's
get these foul people removed from positions of power and authority.
Do you honestly believe those who are doing
the hardest fighting are in the paper and are
publicly praised for notable feats?
For the sake of avoiding unnecessary dissension, I believe we are on a similar track.
Carry on the fight Anon!
Godspeed.