In all actuality it is not the personal filtering that
this guy is against. Rather, it is the banning of
anons who talk about certain issues even though
they are not being hateful.
Such as FE, for example.
Those who are blind are banning those with sight
and don't even realize it (or do they?)
Those who are promoting the hatred of a race of
people and are calling for their deaths should not
be lumped into the same group as those who
post about flat earth.
Only true shills would try to lump them together
for the purpose of banning them.
You mean kinda like you go on and on and on and
on and on about Obama and Clinton?
You just think it's different because you agree with
one and disagree with the other.
I'm actually a little shocked that no MSM
reporter has ever asked the white house if
President Trump was Q.
You know they are aware of him.
How about this… ban people who call for the
murder of others and let everyone else alone.
Boy, I wish their was a country that was founded
on those principles.
OH WAIT… there is.
kek
It takes darkness for evil and secrets to fester.
Let the light in, unban anons who have different
ideas but are not spewing hatred (real hatred not
the fake kind like saying homosexuality is wrong).
Watchers are here.
When certain topics begin to gain traction the
watcher call their "army" who in turn spring
into action and flood the board to cloud the
water.
Unfortunately, many anons are not informed
enough about what is truth so they are unable
to properly distinguish between what is shill
and what is actually truth.
This is why that banning memes and coversation
is dangerous.
If posts are not evil (porn, hate, murder, ect) then
they should be left alone.
The validity of what you said depends entirely on
what the actual truth is.
If aliens are controlling the evil and are eating our
children then it is a Q related topic.
If the earth is actually flat with a dome and their
is no outer space and the cabal blinding the world
then that is a Q related topic.
The problem is, few of you actually know which
is the truth (if either) and therefore are not
able to make informed decsions on who to ban.
What if CIA clowns (who do know which one is
true (if either) and are intentionally banning the
conversation?
If you don't like it, filter but don't ban from board.
If it's true, it's not nonsense.
Which one is true?
Which one is false?
Provide the sauce and prove it or else be exposed
as proving my point. YOU DON'T KNOW.
Thank you for playing.
The Christian fulfilled Bible doesn't say their is a
time to hate. It actually says to love your enemies.
However, you are right in the sense that the enemy
will wrongly lable your words as hateful if it does
not like what you're saying.
But that trick only works on people who are not
properly informed about actual truth.
Sadly, this translates into most of the population.
The Moray Radient Energy Device
BANNED
Why? You know why.
Troy Reed Magnetic Motor
BANNED
Why? You know why.