Anonymous ID: 448663 May 22, 2018, 10:08 p.m. No.1514466   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4487 >>4511

>>1514421

 

Look, I'm happy for Hannity and glad he is on our side. I just don't see the fawning over him that goes on here.

 

Is he any more important than the unknown agents doing the hard work? Is he more important than the anons here and on social media? He is a cog in the machine, a cog I am also happy to be considered for this movement.

 

But that is all he is.

 

You anons provide more information to more people than Hannity ever will.

Anonymous ID: 448663 May 22, 2018, 10:18 p.m. No.1514559   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1514529

 

I'll stop with Hannity. TBH, I have lost trust in all the media. I'm not even sure the audience numbers they post are accurate. We know they lie to us, why would we believe anything they say, even if it is what we like to hear?

Anonymous ID: 448663 May 22, 2018, 10:28 p.m. No.1514649   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4696

>>1514620

 

Another anon posted this on a previous bread.

 

โ€œBriefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backwardโ€”reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them.

In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.โ€

 

โ€• Michael Crichton