>>15141651
Yet, from the English translation, poor as it is, they've communicated that the stories in history people are reading about, as you explain you are doing,, did all, in general, happen; just not in the accepted time frame.
Fomenko bases his work on all the extant Chronicles of history, the originals.
And there was massive forgery effort in the Middle Ages/ Renaissance, which can be proven
It's been shown.
The reason for that hiding of the truth, I haven't gotten into yet; too busy, yet I have some guesses / hypothesizes;
The same reason the folks in control lie to us now?
It's the same shtick, you can see it repeated over and over.
They are still lying.
What;s such a surprise after what we have seen and what we are seeing now?
Was it any different 400 years ago, or is Fake News part of their centuries long policy?
The premise of all official history is the timeline created by "Julius Caesar Scaligaria"( (SCALE Julius Caesar?) Isn't that supposed to be an ancient name according to the official story?)
It 's always important to first check your premises and assumptions.
If one's assumptions are wrong; everything that follows will also be incorrect.
That's a very mathematical axiom.
So you have to check Scaligari, and people have checked him.
The timeline "we" use, the official timeline goes back to him, his work.
And his chronology was disputed from the very beginning by certain scholars and thinkers; for example Isaac Newton.
Fomenko has proved his case by mathematics, statistics, physics and astronomy, using computers - but without all that, just by logic it can be seen.
So history is no longer just "story telling" - part of the "Humanities" it belongs to the Sciences now.
As with so much study of how we've been lied to; the most important facts we can depend upon are that the official story is often false and can be proved to be different from what we are told, as it is in this case.
The true story is much more obscure.
You can prove the falsity of the official narrative (as so often happens) without actually proving exactly what did happen. That is more veiled and obscure.
The writings of history are not all provably false, except that many characters are echos of other characters from other seemingly different story lines.
Think of the game of Telephone and how that would operate over some hundreds of years? From different Countries, different locations, different languages….?
Also how the institutions of learning are controlled. If you ask too many questions, you won't pass. You have to accept their premises and accept their authority. in order to proceed.
That's the carrot they hand out for their official knowledge.
Over generations this practice has influenced the entire field.
No time to do more work on this right now, but it's super interesting and definitely the powers -that-be are hard at work to discredit it. -
"Beginner's Mind" is sought after, because one isn't so full of what one thinks one knows, so is open to learning something new; So often amateurs excel in fields where the experts are blind; Think of Trump.
Fomenko and his group , though, are far different from amateurs. However from a crossover field.
My friend a very good writer an journalist explained how Hunter Thompson excelled as a sport commentator
"It's a cross -over field for him"
So that cross -over position can bring freshness of view?
Fomenko's discovered, regarding eclipses, (which he happened upon from his astrophysical work on the "3 - body problem") led to 40 years of work with a team of researchers who joined him at some point. 150 books in Russian.have been produced from their efforts so far.
It makes sense that chronology should fall to a "counter" a mathematician.
2 of 2
https://tora3.com/video/8ea9a45c39938c4a240bebcf0e64660f
"History by Maths"