>>15141796
I want a clear term for this, the false dichotomy, and another term for the thirdDoor interpretation.
We see content from “germs/virus exist, but are bad” to “body needs certain things to run disease free” and we polarize a bit on that.
It could be both, germs+terrain, neither can disprove the other maybe, I would need a lot more familiarity with both to know. But its not a binary reality, its not either or.
Read Jim West
https://harvoa-med.blogspot.com/2020/04/COVID2020.html
I suggest you hit “reality checks” and focus on #2. his “virus” stance, is one we see here on the main forum and throught the debate.
He takes on his divergence from Sucharit Bhakdi, and where they agree which is on a great deal. They both emphasize air pollution patterns and data analysis cross check with what we get from Sars Con artists 2019-2021.
And check out his data on fracked fuel pollution and dangerous cyanide an entirely plausible causitive agent we could be grabbing data on. How to test fuel?
All this toxicity, from ALL sources, can be additive, can multiply other effects and in general its even measurable by any science or medicine or heath methodology. In many cases is has been done, like with air polution. But also in mainstream science and even alopathic western medicine. All sides can agree that air polution is a problem that exacerbates symptoms and mortality of CuufVlooey no matter what actually causes it.
Its a 3rd door stance based on an alternative view, a way of proceeding to treat the symptoms and mortality. Flu too. Its could be a superier insight to break out with a message that we KNOW we are poisoning ourselves and our children and babies.
By just removing the widespread exposures, or at least measuring them and then publicizing them and the true risks being taken. We need to protect our air supply from big oil. How can we test our air? Its a worthy question as well. A 3rd door approach to all the bullshit door1v2 useless debates.
Whether a virus exists or not, even a germ, or not, we can still bolster our defenses cheaply and with the highest quality guidance, and we can learn how to avoid exposure and where risks actually lie.
Its not operation chaos19, it was just poison in the fuel dummy! An entirely different interpreation than I seen widely emphasized. There is a big financial conflict of interest in NOT going to extra steps to make our fuel products safe, for old people with comorbidities.
This shatters the narrative of some door1’s and door2’s at the same time.
Stop choking on smog, as a public health message. Stop making smog with special poisons in it, yeah, who is gonna oppose that message 🙂
Fuel prices would rise. We shouldn’t expect to be able to detect that. We would need to measure fuel contaminant levels, and local air quality, even in our house, if Terrain is to be the cause, or if virus is to be the cause. Or several other combinations of science, health, medicine, of a very wide and complex nature.