The Flu is a man made bioweapon.
As we have all been led to believe, Influenza Pandemics are a part of human history.
We are told they are endemic, always around, and have been for the beginning of time, but there are some problems that keep arising when you research the history of flu epidemics.
From the paper "Reviewing the History of Pandemic Influenza: Understanding Patterns of Emergence and Transmission" we get the following summary:
"However, because the virus was not isolated and identified until the twentieth century, medical historians are restricted to searching for known signs and symptoms of influenza infection. An overall lack of data up until 1500 precludes significant analysis of the influenza outbreaks of the more distant past [12]."
And then, from the same article
"Several patterns emerge in examining early pandemics. The first is an overall lack of quality, rigour, and validity in the available evidence. Inconsistencies in disease recognition and reporting make it difficult to estimate with certainty the attributable health burden of these disease outbreaks. "
The problem is, that the flu, with its well known symptoms that we can all describe, hasn't been described before!
The fact is, it should have been one of the most easily recognized, and therefore described, diseases in history.
Yet no such records exist. Just disease that "sortakindamighta been", and because the researcher wanted to find evidence of the flu, merely decided that it was evidence of the flu.
The most significant absence from the data is that the period the flu lasts, 6 to 12 weeks, yet no such description of this periodicity exists.
In 1892, German bacteriologist Richard Pfeiffer isolated what he thought was the causative agent of influenza. The culprit, according to Pfeiffer, was a small rod-shaped bacterium that he isolated from the noses of flu-infected patients He dubbed it Bacillus influenzae (or Pfeiffer's bacillus).
In 1920s and 30s, most scientists believed that Pfeiffer's bacillus caused influenza. But then Peter Olitsky and Frederick Gates (Gates Research paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2128182/pdf/125.pdf) at The Rockefeller Institute, took nasal secretions from patients infected with the 1918 flu and passed them through Berkefeld filters, which exclude bacteria. The infectious agent-which caused lung disease in rabbits passed through the filter, suggesting that it was not a bacterium.
Richard shope, a young physician from Iowa then working on hog cholera at the Rockefeller Institute.
shope and his mentor Paul Lewis took mucus and lung samples from the infected pigs and attempted to isolate the disease-causing agent. They quickly isolated a bacterium that looked exactly like Pfeiffer's human bacterium (and was thus called B. influenzae suis), but when they injected the bacteria into pigs, it caused no disease
shope then filtered the samples and, like Olitsky and Gates, found that the filtrate contained the infectious agent. shope's filtrate caused a highly contagious, influenza-like disease in pigs-albeit a more mild one than seen in naturally-infected pigs. Mixing the filtrate with the bacterium reproduced the severe disease.
BOOM… the bacteria caused no disease, the virus caused a mild disease, but mixing the two causes Infectious Influenza.
How did Bill Gates get so rich. Why is he in the photo with Fauci and Soros? Is he related to the F Gates at the Rockefeller Institute who was researching Influenza?
Have they been making the flu, like Gaddafi said, so they can sell us the vaccine?
How come the flu has disappeared? If it was endemic it should have come back, but it hasn't, Why?
Doesn't make sense, unless they didn't make the flu, so it wouldn't conflate with the Covid bug they also made.
Ah…now it makes sense.
Influenza: exposing the true killer: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2118275/