>>15160220

Tyb

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 7:21 PM]

Explosive hearing happening now in Wisconsin, on how Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's CTCL interfered in the 2020 Election. Tune in to OANN!

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/2288

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 8:02 PM]

In Wisconsin, there are 119,283 "active voters" who have been registered for over 100 years!

The number is over 500K when you add in inactive voters

Third world country voter registrations!

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 8:14 PM]

There are 42,000 voters in Wisconsin who are currently listed as inactive in the August 2021 file, but nevertheless voted in November 2020

Major RED FLAG for phantom voters, which is DOUBLE the margin in the 2020 Election Scam!

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 8:51 PM]

[ Video ]

"Before the election they're inflating the registration rolls…and that creates phantom voters."

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 8:59 PM]

"The hack is in our voter registration rolls…"

Dr. Frank can use Census data to predict ballots for all 72 counties in Wisconsin

You know who was using Census data? The Democrat groups funded by Mark Zuckerberg

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:03 PM]

"We added Census data and zip codes to the map and so now we're moving to figure out how we'll update this"

THEN Wisconsin election officials gave Democrat operatives raw data for active voters, absentee applications, ballots received, and ballots rejected

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:23 PM]

"Somebody could register on 11/1 after the County had reported the registration rolls, they could vote in the election, and then they could be removed from the registration rolls before the next reporting date. And that is happening…

And we've caught that."

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:28 PM]

[ Video ]

"It inflates to a certain percentage every time."

Evidence Wisconsin's voter rolls are artificially inflated before every election

576,976 or 15.9% of registered voters were turned to inactive after the 2016 election

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:40 PM]

[ Video ]

Why inflate voter rolls?

WI reported a 72% turnout in Nov. 2020

It was actually 90 PERCENT of "active" voters

"One big advantage of inflating the database is it makes the turnout look lower…it disguises…a lot of phantom ballots, or harvesting a lot of ballots."

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:48 PM]

[ Video ]

Every single county in Wisconsin follows the exact same pattern of switching active voters to inactive and back again

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:52 PM]

[ Video ]

Milwaukee had 149,000 voters who were switched to inactive

Dane 85,800

Waukesha 41,000

These are huge fluctuations that do not make sense with population changes

"The problem is, once you remove them all, how come they're all coming back again?"

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 9:56 PM]

[ Video ]

64,000 people listed as voting in Nov. 2020 were switched to inactive voters AFTER the election

That is THREE TIMES the election margin

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 10:45 PM]

[ Photo ]

ICYMI: "Biden’s COVID failure"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/bidens-covid-failure

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 10:57 PM]

[ Photo ]

ICYMI: "November’s Jobs Numbers Confirm Biden Is a Failed President"

https://townhall.com/columnists/tommyhicks/2021/12/07/novembers-jobs-numbers-confirm-biden-is-a-failed-president-n2600160

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 11:01 PM]

[ Photo ]

ICYMI: "'I Believe There Were Irregularities' in the 2020 Election: What Pence Says to Angry MAGA Fans About What He Did on Jan. 6"

"Good man, but big mistake on not recognizing the massive voter fraud and irregularities." - President Donald J. Trump

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2021/december/i-believe-there-were-irregularities-in-the-2020-election-what-pence-says-to-angry-maga-fans-about-jan-6

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 11:05 PM]

[ Video ]

Smoking gun!

"They made an agreement to swap cash for getting out the vote."

$8.8 million "swap" for turning out the vote in 5 Democrat heavy Wisconsin cities from Mark Zuckerberg's CTCL

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/2304

>>15160408

I fucking hate Liz Harrington, where is the fucking link to the hearing in Wisconsin you lazy bitch.

I cant fucking find it.

You fuck up Trump's statements every single fucking day and can't seem to add links where needed.

You fucking suck.

ADD THE FUCKING LINK YOU CUNT.

One America News Network, [12/8/2021 7:23 PM]

HAPPENING NOW: Public Hearing on Wisconsin Voter Rolls

Tune in to OAN now for LIVE, uninterrupted coverage.

https://t.me/OANNTV/2936

OAN you fucking cunts.

Where is the fucking link?

One America News Network, [12/8/2021 8:29 PM]

[ Video ]

UPDATE: Public Hearing on Wisconsin Voter Rolls

EVIDENCE PRESENTED SO FAR:

WI had an ACTIVE voter turn out of 93.7%

In Wisconsin, there are 119,283 "active voters" who have been registered for over 100 years!

The number is over 500K when you add in inactive voters

Milwaukee election officials assisted non profit by providing private voter data to democrat group to add voters directly to the WI voter roll and bypass the state.

WI voter database padded voter registration numbers with precursor “0000s” which allows for manipulating voter registration.

The margin of victory is a mere 20,000 votes.

WI has 4.5 million residents over the age of 18. The Wisconsin Election Commission has more than 7 million voters on the roll.

There are 42,000 voters in Wisconsin who are currently listed as inactive in the August 2021 file, but nevertheless voted in November 2020

https://t.me/OANNTV/2937

Where is the fucking link?

Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN), [12/8/2021 9:59 PM]

BREAKING: Wisconsin hearing shows 500,000 voters have been registered for over 100 years and other 'red flags'

https://rsbnetwork.com/news/wisconsin-hearing-shows-500000-voters-have-been-registered-for-over-100-years-and-other-red-flags/

https://t.me/rsbnetwork/956

WISCONSIN HEARING SHOWS 500,000 VOTERS HAVE BEEN REGISTERED FOR OVER 100 YEARS AND OTHER ‘RED FLAGS’

A public hearing on Wisconsin’s voter rolls on Wednesday revealed widespread opportunity for election fraud through old voter rolls.

According to the state’s Committee on Campaign and Elections, there are 119,283 “active voters” and hundreds of thousands more “inactive” voters who have been registered for over a century.

This number, which totals over 500,000, leaves the door wide open for bad actors to cast invalid votes on behalf of those names who have since passed away sometime in the past 100 years.

Also sounding the alarm is 42,000 voters listed as “inactive” as of August 2021, but somehow voted in the November 2020 election.

Liz Harrington, President Donald Trump’s official spokeswoman, emphasized this “Major RED FLAG for phantom voters, which is double the margin in the 2020 Election Scam!”

There are 42,000 voters in Wisconsin who are currently listed as inactive in the August 2021 file, but nevertheless voted in November 2020

Major RED FLAG for phantom voters, which is DOUBLE the margin in the 2020 Election Scam! pic.twitter.com/6xY0bt95Kn

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 8, 2021

This hearing comes amid increasing attention on Wisconsin’s 2020 election results, being that it was a swing state Trump heavily focused on during the campaign and was poised to win. After winning Wisconsin in 2016 against Hillary Clinton, Trump allegedly lost it to Joe Biden by a slim margin of just 20,682 votes.

Because of the speculation regarding the legitimacy of the results, GOP lawmakers recently succeeded in pressing the state to conduct a 2020 election audit, which yielded shocking levels of irregularities and evidences of fraud.

Since then, a sheriff in Racine County filed criminal referrals against Wisconsin election officials due to what they believe is election tampering.

One Wisconsin lawmaker, after having seen the mountainous proof of an insecure presidential election, has called to decertify the 2020 presidential election.

https://rsbnetwork.com/news/wisconsin-hearing-shows-500000-voters-have-been-registered-for-over-100-years-and-other-red-flags/

WHERE IS THE FUCKING LINK?

>>15160568

Thank you Anon

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 11:13 PM]

[ Video ]

In Kenosha, Facebook CEO's money went to bus Democrat-targeted voters to the polls

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 11:18 PM]

[ Video ]

Milwaukee used Facebook CEO's money to target "LatinX and African American voters" to vote by creating an "edgy" but "tasteful" campaign to "harness" anti-police protests

Liz Harrington, [12/8/2021 11:26 PM]

[ Video ]

"I don't think they were serious about addressing Covid at all, it was all about getting out the vote from the inception."

They used Covid to cheat!

https://t.me/LizHarrington76/2307

>>15160571

Baker will ignore unsauced shit, because there is no time to search when baking,

Sucked in

All that effort and you are ignored because its your fault for not saucing it.

ICYMI: "CHINA FIRST: Biden-Linked CCP Oil Firm Hits Record Production Amidst Keystone Pipeline Cancellation"

https://thenationalpulse.com/exclusive/biden-linked-energy-firm-hits-record-level-production/

CHINA FIRST: Biden-Linked CCP Oil Firm Hits Record Production Amidst Keystone Pipeline Cancellation.

Increasing evidence suggests Joe Biden is running the American government for the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party.

AChinese state-run oil and gas company linked to the son of the President of the United States, Hunter Biden, hit record levels of production amidst President Biden’s decision to halt the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline.

Sinopec, also known as China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation, is a Chinese Communist regime-controlled oil and gas enterprise. Its “fully-owned subsidiary” Sinopec Marketing Company enjoyed nearly $1 billion in investment from Hunter Biden’s private equity firm BHR Partners.

Finalized in March 2015, the investments from the controversial investment fund led to BHR Partners amassing a nearly 30 percent stake in Sinopec.

Hunter reportedly still owns a 10 percent stake in BHR Partners.

China First.

Under the Biden government, Sinopec’s Fuling Shale Gas Field hit a country-wide record for production quantity.

A company press release notes:

Fuling Shale Gas Field – the first commercially developed and operated large-scale shale gas field in China – announced on October 8 that it has produced 40 billion cubic meters of shale gas, setting a new record for the cumulative production of shale gas in the country.

BHR Partner’s LinkedIn profile highlights its Sinopec investment, revealing it was involved “in the pilot state-owned enterprise reform deal involving the segregation and capitalization of Sinopec Group’s non-oil business into Sinopec Marketing Corporation.”

Sinopec’s record-breaking success follows the Biden regime’s assault on American energy independence, including the cancellation of the critical Keystone XL Pipeline and shutting down oil and gas lease sales from federal land in his first days in office.

The bitch has time to post fake telegram accounts but can't post a complete statement from Trump.

I fucking hate Liz Harrington.

Good lord, give me one telegram account I can get every single PDJT statements and ICYMI from.

Amen

>>15160653

filtered

>>15160670

I deleted that website for being days too late. NO.

Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro, [12/8/2021 11:55 PM]

[Forwarded from Liberty Mom]

I like the Brave browser and the new Brave search. The founder, Brendan Eich, used to be the head of Firefox, but they kicked him out when he supported legislation to keep marriage between a man and a woman. He then founded Brave. I have been using his browser ever since.

https://t.me/jeffrey_peterson/3691

Insider Paper, [12/8/2021 11:03 AM]

[ Video ]

JUST IN: Indian military helicopter carrying Army’s Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat crashes in Tamil Nadu, India.

Gen. Bipin Rawat has died, says Indian army’s Lt Gen H S Panag (R).

Read: https://insiderpaper.com/indian-cds-general-bipin-rawat-dead/

https://t.me/insiderpaper/5885

Insider Paper, [12/8/2021 10:18 PM]

NEW: Bill Gates predicts, "I think the acute phase of the pandemic will come to a close some time in 2022."

Follow @InsiderPaper

https://t.me/insiderpaper/5902

>>15160710

window there not a door

>>15160714

brics is having some trouble..

not impressed

>>15160734

Tracy Beanz, [12/8/2021 2:25 PM]

[ Photo ]

Look at that number — $3,500,000,001 — and you can’t even question for informed consent. That’s purportedly your tax dollars (seems more like money created out of thin air to me).

(Taken from attorney Siri’s FOIA lawsuit against the FDA for Pfizer information leading to approval. See: https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/PHMPT-Brief-and-Appendix-d6a070167ae9767a5f711a5d21bb0a6c.pdf)

@TracyBeanzOfficial

https://t.me/TracybeanzOfficial/1799

Liberty Overwatch, [12/8/2021 4:49 PM]

[ Video ]

Never-Ending Jab Money Printing Machine

Billionaire BioNTech Founder and CEO Uğur Şahin recommends a multi-dose vaccine for the mild Moronic variant, which has symptoms similar to the common cold:

"It is very clear that our vaccine for the Omicron variant should be a 3-dose vaccine."

While Şahin pushes a vaccine treadmill strategy for others, he admitted in a December 5th interview with DW News (https://brandnewtube.com/watch/biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin-quot-i-039-m-not-legally-allowed-to-take-the-vaccine-quot_rhN6ZioU32O4ZpT.html?lang=german) that he has not received any BioNTech Covid jabs. In a stumbling statement, he falsely claimed, “I am not legally allowed to take the vaccine at the moment.” However, Great Mountain Publishing (https://greatmountainpublishing.com/2021/12/06/the-ceo-of-biontech-admitted-he-has-not-been-vaccinated-and-then-lied-about-the-reason/) points out that “on June 7, 2021, priority restrictions were lifted for all available vaccines across the whole of Germany. Any person, regardless of the state of their health or their occupation, can now be vaccinated (https://www.sbk.org/sbk-en/advice/services/stay-healthy/vaccinations/covid-19-vaccinations/).”

Hat tips🤠 @goddek, @Disclosetv, TRXA

@LibertyOverwatchChannel

https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/6107

John Durham says evidence shows Michael Sussmann lied when pushing Trump-Russia claims

by Jerry Dunleavy, Justice Department Reporter | | December 08, 2021 12:02 PM

John Durham pushed back on Michael Sussmann’s claims that former FBI General Counsel James Baker undermined the special counsel’s false statements indictment against the Democratic lawyer, contending evidence from five government employees, including Baker, supports the charge.

The indictment against Sussmann centers on a Sept. 19, 2016, meeting between him and Baker in which Sussmann pushed debunked allegations of a secret back channel between Russia’s Alfa Bank and the Trump Organization. Durham contends that while Sussmann told Baker he was not working for any particular client, Sussmann was secretly doing the bidding of Hillary Clinton’s campaign and billing his services to her, as well as working on behalf of technology executive Rodney Joffe.

Sussmann denies misleading the FBI and pleaded not guilty .

As part of its effort to push for an early May 2022 trial date instead of the late July 2022 trial date preferred by prosecutors, Sussmann’s team claimed on Monday that last week, Durham’s team handed over documents about Baker’s statements about the 2016 meeting that it said “directly contradict the Special Counsel’s allegation that Mr. Sussmann affirmatively told Mr. Baker that he was not meeting with him on behalf of any clients.” The team pointed to excerpts of interviews Baker gave to DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz’s investigators in 2019 and to Durham’s team in 2020.

Durham’s team quickly pushed back in a Tuesday court filing.

“As the defendant is aware from discovery, both of those interviews occurred years after the events in question, and Mr. Baker made these statements before he had the opportunity to refresh his recollection with contemporaneous or near-contemporaneous notes that have been provided to the defense in discovery,” Durham’s team said. “Indeed, the defendant’s motion entirely ignores law enforcement reports of Mr. Baker’s subsequent three interviews with the Special Counsel’s Office in which he affirmed and then re-affirmed his now-clear recollection of the defendant’s false statement.”

Durham’s team made it clear in October that it plans to call Baker to testify to prove its case.

Sussmann’s team noted to the court that Baker said in an excerpt of an interview from 2019 that Sussmann talked about “his clients, who were, he described as I recall it, sort of cyber-security experts.” Durham’s team also wrote in an excerpted summary in 2020 that “Baker said that Sussmann did not specify that he was representing a client regarding the matter, nor did Baker ask him if he was representing a client. Baker said it did not seem like Sussmann was representing a client.”

Sussmann’s lawyers said the existence of what they see as exculpatory information “only underscores the baseless and unprecedented nature of this indictment.”

>>15160888

But Durham’s team said that the discovery handed over to Sussmann’s team so far actually “reflects that the recollections and/or contemporaneous records of five separate government employees support the Indictment’s allegations.”

In the indictment , Durham said Baker spoke with Bill Priestap, then the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, after meeting with Sussmann, that Priestap “took contemporaneous notes,” and that Sussmann had said he was not doing his work "for any client.”

The prosecutors noted that Sussmann failed to mention that another high-ranking official in the FBI Office of General Counsel also took notes that reflect that Sussmann told Baker he had “no specific client.” Durham’s team also said that Sussmann’s motion ignored a memorandum by two “Agency-2” employees after their Feb. 9, 2017, meeting with Sussmann that also reflected that Sussmann said he was not representing “a particular client.”

Durham’s team argued that it was “meritless” for Sussmann to claim that a May 2022 trial date is needed because the prosecution had allegedly only belatedly disclosed Brady evidence, with the prosecutors contending that “the defendant’s motion provides a skewed portrayal of the purported Brady evidence at issue by cherry-picking excerpts from the substantial discovery the Government has already provided to the defense.”

“Brady evidence” refers to the Supreme Court decision in Brady v. Maryland that requires prosecutors to hand over all potentially exculpatory evidence to the defense.

Baker, who left the FBI in 2018, previously defended the flawed Trump-Russia investigation and the FBI’s handling of Christopher Steele’s dossier. Steele’s main source, Igor Danchenko, was also indicted by Durham for allegedly lying to the FBI.

Durham’s team argued that it “shares the defendant’s desire to conduct as speedy a trial as possible in this case” but emphasized it “involves complex discovery and occurs in the midst of an international pandemic.” The prosecutors argued that “a trial date in late July 2022 is reasonable and necessary for the Government to fully declassify and produce discovery” and contended that Sussmann’s request for a May 2022 trial date “would rush and unnecessarily truncate” what needs to happen before the trial.

The prosecutors noted they had handed over more than 91,000 pages in unclassified discovery and more than 5,000 pages in classified discovery to the defense team and insisted that the team was still “working expeditiously to satisfy its discovery obligations."

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/john-durham-says-evidence-shows-michael-sussmann-lied-when-pushing-trump-russia-claims

Liberty Overwatch, [12/8/2021 9:29 PM]

Wisconsin Voter Roll Anomalies Presented at the WI Campaigns & Election Committee Hearing Today

(https://wiseye.org/?p=25751)

Veteran software and database engineer Jeff O’Donnell shared his analysis of Wisconsin’s August 2021 voter file at the Wisconsin Campaigns & Election Committee hearing today. He found “significant red flags” and “highly suspicious issues,” including:

• Although Wisconsin’s population is 5.8M with approximately 4.5M eligible to vote, there are more than 7M separate voter records, suggesting that voters are placed on inactive status rather than being removed.

• Approximately 3.3M Wisconsinites voted in the 2020 election, representing 93.7% of the state’s 3.5M active voters.

• 121,251 active WI voters have been registered for 110 - 119 years (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/6114); in total, more than 500K active and inactive voters have a January 1, 1918 registration date. O’Donnell points out that while that date may have been used as a placeholder when information was missing, 500K is an alarmingly high number.

• According to the WI LAB audit report (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5796), 957,977 voters registered as new voters in 2020; 45,665 of these new voters registered with a driver’s license that did not match DMV records.

• 205,355 active voters have a registration application date of November 3, 2020.

• 10% of voters in the WI voter file (22% of all active voters) registered between May 3, 2020 and November 3, 2020.

• 31,872 of the voters who registered during the 6 months leading up to the 2020 election are now listed as inactive.

• In total, 42K voters (https://t.me/LizHarrington76/2290) who voted in the 2020 election are now listed inactive; O’Donnell points out that, even factoring in changes of address, 42K is an “excessive” number of deactivations for recently active voters.

•The WI registration database API allows users to “switch voters to active at any time as needed.”

“In conclusion, the irregularities and red flags found by both this report and the Valentine report indicate a huge potential for nefarious actors to access the WI registration system and… manipulate any voter’s status. There needs to be an investigation by competent outside database experts to explain the causes of the specific anomalies… and examine the system log files for evidence of external intrusion. The investigation also needs to determine if third party voter organizations have been granted access to the system to create, manipulate, or improperly utilize voter records.”

Watch 📺 WI Assembly Campaigns & Elections Committee Livestream (https://wiseye.org/?p=25751), Marcus Dee YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0kXeQPTEig)

Related🔎

👉 Gableman’s Interim Report (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5947)

👉 Granny Harvesting Summary (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5802)

👉 LAB Audit Highlights (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/5796)

Learn more🔦🧵 WI Thread (https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/6114)

@LibertyOverwatchChannel

—

https://t.me/LibertyOverwatchChannel/6115

Meadows sues Pelosi, Jan. 6 panel and its members

Donald Trump's former chief of staff has claimed he can’t discuss matters that could be covered by executive privilege.

Mark Meadows, facing the looming prospect of criminal contempt of Congress charges, is suing to block a subpoena from the Jan. 6 committee, arguing that it unconstitutionally intrudes on former President Donald Trump's powers to invoke executive privilege.

The former White House chief of staff filed the suit Wednesday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Washington against Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the members of the Capitol riot panel and the committee itself. His attorney says he’s been put in an “untenable position” of choosing to defy the committee — and risk criminal prosecution — or defy his former boss Donald Trump’s attempt to assert executive privilege to block his testimony.

“The Select Committee acts absent any valid legislative power and threatens to violate longstanding principles of executive privilege and immunity that are of constitutional origin and dimension,” the suit filed by Meadows’ attorney George Terwilliger contends.

The Jan. 6 select panel has signaled that it is preparing to hold Meadows in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to cooperate, a move that would send the matter to the Justice Department for potential criminal charges. The panel has rejected Meadow’s claim, noting that current President Joe Biden has not asserted privilege to block Meadows’ testimony. Trump, a former president, has no role in asserting privilege anymore, they say — a position recently supported by another federal judge in Trump’s own lawsuit against the committee.

Asked about the new lawsuit, select panel chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said the panel still planned to move forward with holding Meadows in contempt of Congress next week.

“We will fight it out in court, and we will move with as much expeditious format as we can,” he said.

Asked about Meadows’ claim the committee didn't have “lawful authority” to seek information, Thompson said “in this town, every lawyer has at least one opinion.”

Another panel member, Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) said of the lawsuit: “Sounds like he's trying to delay.”

Last week, Meadows agreed to sit for a deposition before the Jan. 6 committee, but on Tuesday his lawyers said he would no longer appear, citing efforts by the committee to go through third-party vendors, such as telephone companies, to obtain records that might be covered by executive privilege.

Over the course of negotiations, Meadows repeatedly offered to answer written questions or discuss topics he deemed “non-privileged” — including details of his contacts with the Justice Department, which Trump sought to deploy in service of overturning the election. But even within those topics, Meadows described limitations on what he would share.

And he also suggested deferring testimony to the committee about his involvement with a call from Trump to Georgia election officials that has been the subject of a grand jury investigation in Fulton County. But the panel never accepted his offer, reserving the right to ask him about topics he deemed privileged.

In his lawsuit, Meadows also levels a procedural complaint against the committee, noting that Pelosi rejected the appointment of two GOP members selected by Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy to serve on the panel. After Pelosi’s decision, McCarthy pulled his remaining appointees from the committee, leaving Pelosi’s picks as the only remaining members. Pelosi then appointed two Republicans, Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Kinzinger, to the panel.

>>15160946

Meadows contends that McCarthy’s decision to withdraw his remaining picks left the panel without a ranking Republican appointee. Yet the committee’s subpoena authority requires that the ranking members be consulted on subpoena decisions.

"The ordering of Mr. Meadows’ deposition runs afoul of the Select Committee’s authorizing resolution, making it invalid and unenforceable,” Meadows contends.

Meadows also mirrors one of Trump’s central arguments: that the Jan. 6 committee serves no “valid legislative purpose.”

In addition to seeking to block the subpoena to Meadows, the suit filed Wednesday seeks to quash a subpoena the House panel issued to Verizon Wireless for records about the former White House chief of staff’s cell phone use.

Meadows' suit appears similar to one filed in 2019 by former Trump Deputy National Security Adviser Charles Kupperman over a House Intelligence Committee subpoena seeking Kupperman's testimony for use in an impeachment investigation focused on Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

In response to that suit, lawyers for the House argued that the courts cannot entertain suits from subpoenaed witnesses seeking to resolve such privilege claims.

Kupperman’s suit was framed as a request for guidance from the court, and, at times, Meadows’ suit takes a similar tack.

“Mr. Meadows, a witness, has been put in the untenable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims that are of constitutional origin and dimension and having to either risk enforcement of the subpoena issued to him, not merely by the House of Representatives, but through actions by the Executive and Judicial Branches, or, alternatively, unilaterally abandoning the former president’s claims of privileges and immunities,” the suit says. “Thus, Mr. Meadows turns to the courts to say what the law is.”

However, the bulk of Meadows’ court complaint takes a more hostile stance towards the committee. Although just days ago he was pledging cooperation with the panel, Meadows’ attorneys are now arguing that the committee was not properly constituted under House rules.

“This information has no bearing on any contemplated constitutional legislation. It is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversary,” the complaint says.

The House Intelligence Committee dropped its subpoena to Kupperman before the judge assigned to that case, George W. Bush appointee Richard Leon, ruled on whether a witness can take such a fight to court. Leon later dismissed the case.

Another witness subpoenaed by the Jan. 6 committee, former Trump White House adviser Steve Bannon, is facing criminal contempt of Congress charges for his refusal to appear before the committee. He is set to face trial in July.

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/08/meadows-sues-pelosi-jan-6-select-panel-523968