What crimes? You mean the 613 Jewish "commandments of God" plus the Roman laws that established and maintain a bloodline lordship over "commoners"? Our religion based legal system got us into this mess.
"Roman Authority"? Self-granted permission from "God" to be as evil and brutal as possible, to steal and commit genocide by any means necessary?
And what is the historical source of all those laws, that none of us had a hand in creating?
We we're born into slavery under this religious based legal system. We aren't free. Begging for justice from corrupt rulers is no "law" at all, just "legalized" servitude.
>A Mother and a Father are more important than any other upbringing factor in a child's life.
You're talking out of your ass. Clean air and water, nutritious food, a warm dry shelter, protection from the elements, and the legal and socio-economic freedom to live freely, are all way more important than who raises the child.
So, Jewish OT Law, and the Jewish OT God is who our "law serves".
Keep bitching aboit the Jews while beating each other to death to be the better "enforcer" of their laws. Stupid faggots.
Your religious idealism is wholly founded in ignorance. Successful people can be raised by 1 or 2 parents, or without parents, being raised instead by grandparents or othet adopters like aunts and uncles. Successful people cannot come out of children starving to death because both of your parents were too poor to feed you, or from living in a place full of toxic emmissions from corrupt corporate factories that causes infant mortality from disease and illness.
Ex: Ben Carson…single parent household.
No, the State makes a horrible parent, but by God it's the law, and you will comply, because God said so!
Idiot? I don't worship satan's creation (the law) like you, idiot.
I'm not a Jew, and get no benefit from following Moses's post-weed smoking commandments, so I have no respect for them or the corrupt system that perpetuates the system of inequality inherent to the Jewish legal system.
I am the law giver in my castle, as are you. Why do you bow to supposedly superior kings, if we are all equals? Tradition?
Everyone with a birth certificate is a slave to the system. I never had the choice to decline the slave's mark of circumscision, or to choose not to be compelled to attend public indoctrination. The slave system deprives us of those choices, and many many more by serving as our parent, with the force of guns and imprisonment for rejecting their "rule of injustice".
So you worship Rome and it's mythology that glorifies the Emporers, especially the Flavians, Julius Caesar (JC), and St. Mark(us) Aurelius? You put your life up as collateral to prop up the Imperial Cult?
No victim, no crime. Yet, our slave system places the ambiguous entity called "The State" as a victim, when no real victim exists. We live in a legal fiction, as slaves to it.
Who is the victim if someone grows and smokes a flower?
Who is the victim if a vehicle isn't "registered" (title transferred) with the "State"?
Who is the victim when a person doesn't get permission from the "gov't" via a permit before repairing their home?
Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are all now contingent on getting permission from the government. If you have a medical degree, you can commit murder on the daily and face no consequences, because "that's the law". You can worship that piece of shit system, but I won't.
Requiring marriage, without divorce as a pre-requisite to having children, does not "ensure" the well-being of children. It might assuage your moral (religious) feelings, but doesn't do anything to ensure the "well-being" of kids. Married people beat their children (generational trauma) for thousands of years because their religion okayed the beating of slaves, including children, as property. "Spare the rod, spoil the kid." They had two parents…but were still beaten. Was that "good"?
Does having both parents in the home reduce the rate of infant genital mutilation?
There's a matriarchal tribe in China called the Mosuo with ni worda for "father" or "husband" yet the have pristine air and water, and the women make all the decisions.
Them bitches are gonna burn in Christian hell FOR ETERNITY. Two-parent households FTW!
www.mosuoproject.org
Living near the border of Tibet in the Yunnan and Sichuan provinces, the Mosuo are perhaps the most famous matriarchal society, with extended family in large households; at the head of each is a matriarch. Lineage is traced through the female side of the family, and property is passed down along the same matriline. Children are raised in the mother's households and take her name.
The Mosuo people are practising a custom called “walking marriage,” by which the men are visiting their beloved ones in their private bedrooms at night and return to their own mother-clan´s houses in the morning. There is no stigma against women having multiple partners. Children take their mother’s name and the men may not be involved in their upbringing. There’s no word in the local language for father or husband.
Women in the Mosuo wield much power and enjoy autonomy in several ways. They take care of labor in the selfsustainable economy at home, and historically the men have been involved in trade and are often away. The society is an agrarian culture, with annual incomes as low as US $150, as they are typically self-sufficient.
Voluntaryism doean't have a parasitic ruling class, but the State Worshipping Puritans from the Presbyterian Church of England killed the idea.
Precursors to the voluntaryist movement had a long tradition in the English-speaking world, at least as far back as the Leveller movement of mid-seventeenth century England. The Leveller spokesmen John Lilburne and Richard Overton who "clashed with the Presbyterian puritans, who wanted to preserve a state-church with coercive powers and to deny liberty of worship to the puritan sects".[5]
The Levellers were nonconformist in religion and advocated for the separation of church and state. The church to their way of thinking was a voluntary associating of equals, and furnished a theoretical and practical model for the civil state. If it was proper for their church congregations to be based on consent, then it was proper to apply the same principle of consent to its secular counterpart. For example, the Leveller 'large' Petition of 1647 contained a proposal "that tythes and all other inforced maintenances, may be for ever abolished, and nothing in place thereof imposed, but that all Ministers may be payd only by those who voluntarily choose them, and contract with them for their labours."[5] The Levellers also held to the idea of self-proprietorship.[5]
Watner, Smith and McElroy explained that voluntaryists were advocates of non-political strategies to achieve a free society. They rejected electoral politics "in theory and practice as incompatible with libertarian goals" and argued that political methods invariably strengthen the legitimacy of coercive governments. In concluding their "Statement of Purpose", they wrote: "Voluntaryists seek instead to delegitimize the State through education, and we advocate the withdrawal of the cooperation and tacit consent on which state power ultimately depends".
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntaryism
Public school education tends to leave out anything that would upset the Patriarchal "Father/God" establishment.