inb4

no filters = full nudism enforced, everywhere, all the time

>>1518764

> like the ultimate obvious in your face proofs

no.

it's not bad, but leaves plenty room for deniability.

if that's your ultimate,

re-read crumbs from the start, get more familiar with the timeline.

>>1518782

>This also means no more locked private social media accounts.

so, basically, hell?

total digital panopticon + gaming social standing & obedience, enough to make China jealous.

phew no thanks

>>1518798

it's absurd.

people can twat what they want, no obligation to read…

should Trump be legally obligated to answer every phone call to the WhiteHouse, all the time?

Ah ok, not the phone, that would be impossible/ridiculous.

but not tweets?

>>1518832

you're a fucking newfag and idiot for

both

not being aware of different boards

not having typed it to see for yourself

gtfo of qresearch

and go get training wheels:

>>1254488 – QBOARD QUESTIONS (testing/ questions about how to post/italic/bold/etc)

>>1518855

that's the spirit

(except for replying. don't.)

>>1518980

anons like to fantasize about historians reading these breads.

it's the psychologists/sociologists that will have material to work on for centuries…

personnally am amazed and sad at how often and how much anons can't seem to ever think of attacks other than sexual (gay, dick, ass, etc, oooh he's gay noooo yer gay hahaaaaa obama so gay gay gay gay)… oh, anons, if only you knew how little effect that has on them and how much it says about you…

>>1519361

just need better eyes, anon.

look closer

>>1519465

baker

not able

(kidding, kidding)

(you're right.)

(so many toddlers around)