https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1470170774686375943?s=20
Raheem J. Kassam
@RaheemKassam
So they couldn't secure a blockchain election system, but they really need you to believe the drop boxes and antiquated machines were TOTALLY SECURE.
https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1470548167158636544?s=20
@JoeBiden is just a horrible trash human being.
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1470429404161527809?s=20
Yes they know, they dont care, it was about stealing an election
https://twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1470170535548100613?s=20
Nick Short @PoliticalShort
“Single-handedly the Bidenpuppeteers have managed to restore the Trump record of achievement simply by doing the opposite of what Trump did, thereby ensuring their own failure and reminding voters of what once was working.”
https://twitter.com/PoliticalShort/status/1470411781306736640?s=20
Agreed go back to paper ballots
Chasten Buttigieg Upset Biden’s Student Loan Freeze Ending: ‘LOL No Thank You’
Nick Gilbertson13 Dec 2021
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s husband, Chasten Buttigieg, is upset the Biden administration’s freeze on student loans is soon ending.
In August, the Biden administration extended the freeze on student loans until the end of January 2022, with a zero percent interest rate, Breitbart News reported. Now that the extension is coming to an end, Chasten, 32, is upset he will have to pay off his loans.
Chasten publicly voiced his displeasure in an Instagram story post on Saturday,where he shared an image of a message he received indicating he would once again have to make payments.
“Chasten, Your student loan payments restart after Jan. 31, 2022. You’ll soon receive a bill from your student loan servicer,” the message read.
“LOL no thank you Merry Christmas next,” the transportation secretary’s husband wrote in the post.
The Instagram post has garnered criticism.
Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-NC) weighed in on Chasten’s post in a statement to Fox News.
“Chasten Buttigieg’s personal responsibility seems to be lost in Pete Buttigieg’s supply chain crisis,” Cawthorn said.
“When the Washington elites start thinking they’re victims just because they have to pay their bills, expect that mentality to spill over into the radical socialist policies of the Biden administration,” the representative added.
“These are the guys who complained that they couldn’t afford rent in DC on Pete’s $220K salary (and all their money from writing books),” tweeted Republican communicator Matt Whitlock. “A good reminder that the left’s “cancel student loan debt” goal would overwhelmingly help financially comfortable people.”
Whitlock was alluding to a July interview with the Washington Post, in which Chasten made a fuss about Washington, DC, rental prices.
He said the transportation secretary and he “couldn’t afford the one-bedroom-plus-den,” though Sec. Buttigieg’s salary is listed at $221,400, according to the Post.
The couple settled for an 800-square-foot apartment for around $3,000 per month in the elitist Captial Hill neighborhood of Eastern Market. They chose the high-end building “because of its location and the security it offered,” the Post reports.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/13/chasten-buttigieg-upset-bidens-student-loan-freeze-ending/
I have nothing to say on this but Democrats only push things for their own benefit
CNN: Devastation Awaits Democrats in 2022 Midterms
Katherine Hamilton13 Dec 2021
Far left CNN detailed the signs of looming defeat for Democrats in the 2022 midterms in an analysis piece on Sunday, saying pretty much “every single indicator” is pointing to a landslide victory for House Republicans.
“Pretty much every single indicator that pointed to a Democratic wave in the 2018 midterms now points to a Republican one in the 2022 midterms,” Harry Enten wrote.
According to the report, Democrats were beating Republicans by nine points in the polls by early December 2017, and “as it turned out, this was the margin by which they’d win the national House vote” the next year. In December 2021, Republicans are holding an average two-point advantage.
“Indeed, there have been ten times since 1938 when the opposition party (i.e. not in control of the presidency) led on the generic ballot this far from a midterm. They would go on to win a majority of seats in the midterm all ten of those times,” Enten continued.
Enten specifically pointed to three crucial signs a red wave could be barreling its way toward the D.C. swamp: President Joe Biden’s dismal approval ratings, special elections, and House retirements.
CNN credited Democrats’ 2018 win to then-President Donald Trump’s approval rating, which Enten said was averaging 37 percent in December 2017.
“President Joe Biden is not much better with an approval rating of about 42 [percent]. His is the second worst approval rating for an elected president at this point in their first term,” according to the analysis.
As far as special elections go, Republicans are doing an average of five points better than the 2020 presidential margin in an average of roughly 60 legislative and federal special elections. Before Democrats took the reins from Republicans in 2018, Democrat candidates were averaging about 10 points better than the 2016 presidential margin in more than 70 special legislative and federal special elections, Enten wrote. According to the report:
While we still have a ways to go until the midterms, we know that the shift from the presidential baseline in special elections has been predictive of the next election. This has been true in midterms since 1994, and a lack of a major change from the 2016 baseline during the special elections in the lead up to 2020 was a major red flag that Republicans weren’t as in much trouble as some of the polling indicated.
Similar to House Republicans in December 2017, 19 Democrats are leaving the House at the end of this Congress. Enten said, “results and polling are a big reason that politicians have or did run for the hills.” He wrote:
Retirements are not a perfect indicator of future midterm outcomes, but they’re a sign. Elected officials are looking at the same statistics we are. They aren’t likely to retire en masse, unless they sense they’re going to lose power. That’s why the party that has had more elected officials retiring from public office has lost seats in eight of the last 12 midterm cycles since 1974.
The “bottom line,” Enten concluded, is that the opposition party has “picked up 5 or more seats in 34 of 38 midterms since 1870.”
“Not a lot so far suggests that the 2022 midterms will be any different,” he wrote.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/13/cnn-devastation-awaits-democrats-in-2022-midterms/
China Begins Walking Back Promises to Reduce Pollution in the 2030s
John Hayward13 Dec 2021
China never intended to clean up their country, why would they
Two months later, the Chinese are backing away from that road map, as the SCMP reported:
Addressing a forum in Beijing on Saturday, former finance minister Lou Jiwei said that while China had said it would “strive to” reach peak carbon emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060, there was a difference between this and “ensuring [those targets would be achieved]”.
“We are a developing country. We should bear common but differentiated responsibilities that are different from developed countries,” Lou told the gathering organised by the China Centre for International Economic Exchanges.
Han Wenxiu, from the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs, was similarly cautious, saying the two targets were complex and long-term tasks that required full consideration of the country’s energy and industrial structure.
“[The carbon targets] should not affect the country’s overall economic and social development,” Han said.
The day before those comments were made, Chinese dictator Xi Jinping and his Politburo issued a statement that said reaching carbon neutrality will require “unwavering efforts,” but success “can’t be achieved in just one battle.”
The same statement made it clear that China will not stop burning coal to generate electricity. The Chinese are currently pouring record amounts of coal into record numbers of power plants to meet the soaring energy needs of their industrial sector. As several Chinese analysts explained to the SCMP, critical power shortages in the latter half of 2021 frightened communist leaders away from any thoughts they might have been entertaining about eliminating coal.
“Wind and solar power account for about 9 percent of China’s electricity generation. The dominant role of coal in China’s power and energy structure cannot be changed in a short time,” Lin Boqiang of the China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy at Xiamen University explained.
Ma Jun of the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs in Beijing said the statement by Xi and the Politburo on Friday was a sign that “replacements have not been building up and we cannot phase out fossil fuels in a quick way.”..
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2021/12/13/china-begins-walking-back-promises-reduce-pollution-2030s/
Agreed, they are ignoring the elephant in the room, 2020 was stolen and it will happen again, unless its fixed
Have a great day anons!
Watch:NBC’s ‘Saturday Night Live’ Jokes About Roger Stone’s Cancer-Stricken Wife Getting Gang-Raped
David Ng13 Dec 2021
SNL has singlehandedly killed comedy
NBC’s Saturday Night Live aired a joke about members of Congress gang-raping Roger Stone’s wife, who is battling cancer. The tasteless one-liner came from “Weekend Update” anchor Michael Che, who elicited a mix of groans and guffaws from the show’s live studio audience.
In Saturday’s episode, Michael Che addressed Roger Stone’s legal battles with Congress’ partisan January 6 commission.
“Trump advisor Roger Stone, who draws his glasses on with a sharpie, refused to cooperate with the committee investigating the January 6th attacks — though Stone said he would be open to sitting in the corner watching the committee take turns on his wife,” Che said.
Nydia Stone has been diagnosed with Stage 3 cancer, which has spread to her lungs, a family representative announced earlier this year. In April, the Biden Justice Department sued Stone and his wife, claiming the couple owes about $2 million in federal income taxes.
Last month, Che used his “Weekend Update” segment to mock Kyle Rittenhouse, stating, “hopefully he got all of that shooting out of his system before he becomes a cop.”
NBC’s SNL has been struggling with weak ratings this season. The season premiere in October saw its ratings collapse by about 50 percent, with a subsequent episode featuring host Rami Malek and musical guest Young Thug also scraping the bottom of the barrel.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2021/12/13/nbc-saturday-night-live-jokes-about-gang-raping-roger-stones-cancer-stricken-wife/
Trump Gushes over Terrorist-supporting Palestinian Leader; Slams Netanyahu
Joel B. Pollak13 Dec 2021
Ok this is going to get good, Bibi should have shut his mouth
Former President Donald Trump was full of praise for terrorist-supporting Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in a recent interview — while claiming that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not want to reach a peace deal.
Axios’ Barak Ravid, who conducted the interview with Trump for a new book about Trump’s peace efforts, reported Monday:
“I don’t think Bibi ever wanted to make peace,” Trump told me in April, referring to Netanyahu by his nickname in a 90-minute, face-to-face interview for my new book, “Trump’s Peace: The Abraham Accords and the Reshaping of the Middle East.”
…
Trump said that at an early stage of his presidency, he realized that Netanyahu would be a bigger obstacle to peace than Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
“I thought he was terrific,” Trump told me of Abbas, reflecting on their “great” first meeting. “He was almost like a father. Couldn’t have been nicer. I thought he wanted to make a deal more than Netanyahu.”
Trump admitted to Ravid that Abbas and the Palestinians had proved to be “hardened” against the deal. Nevertheless, he said that other Israeli leaders, such as Netanyahu rival Benny Gantz, seemed to be more acceptable to the Palestinians as partners.
The Palestinian Authority government currently provides stipends to convicted Palestinian terrorists in Israeli jails, and the families of Palestinian terrorists killed by Israel. It also names public buildings and parks after famous Palestinian terrorists.
The issue came up during Trump’s presidency, when he signed the Taylor Force Act, which prevents U.S. funds from being sent to the Palestinian Authority as long as it supports terror (and which the Biden administration is trying to circumvent).
Netanyahu has, in fact, negotiated agreements with the Palestinians in the past, and embraced Trump’s framework for peace in early 2020. He has, however, resisted further removals of Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria, or security concessions.
Notably, Netanyahu refrained from annexing the West Bank to Israel under the Abraham Accords, despite domestic pressure from right-wing parties for him to do so, out of deference to the Trump Administration’s efforts to negotiate in the region.
Last week, Ravid revealed that Trump had bitter feelings toward Netanyahu over the latter’s willingness to recognize Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 presidential election: “Fuck him,” Trump said, adding he had not spoken to Netanyahu since.
Netanyahu responded by noting that as Israel’s leader, he had no choice but to recognize the incoming U.S. government. He also thanked Trump, again, for the numerous achievements made during his presidency, including the Abraham Accords.
Some players in the diplomatic process, notably former U.S. Ambassador David Friedman, have disputed some of Ravid’s claims, saying he was never consulted for the book and that reports by Ravid should therefore be taken with “a grain of salt.”
Trump’s hostility to Netanyahu is raising questions in pro-Israel circles about his ability to manage ties with Israel if he wins in 2024, especially if Netanyahu regains office. Many potential Republican candidates for the presidency also have strong records on Israel, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, and others.
Trump told Ravid that he still supports Israel, though in spite of Netanyahu, not because of his relationship with him.
https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2021/12/13/trump-gushes-over-terrorist-supporting-palestinian-leader-slams-netanyahu/
They pushed DWAC down to $48, I’d buy that but only if you have the money, check out DWACW also
Current prices
DWAC - Digital World Acquisition Corp.
NasdaqGM - NasdaqGM Real Time Price. Currency in USD
48.05
-2.44 (-4.82%)As of 09:33AM EST. Market open.
DWACW - Digital World Acquisition Corp.
NasdaqGM - NasdaqGM Real Time Price. Currency in USD
15.68
-0.74 (-4.54%)As of 09:36AM EST. Market open.
Yep
We will never forget them stealing the election or all the evil done in the last five years
Early 70s only time it was really funny, up until 1990 (some funny), they are political suicide vesters, even dems hate the show
They have ruptured their relationship with charitable humans for all time now…they deserve everything they get! They released this BS right after Kenosha where a black man killed and maimed 60+ people. They will never recover
Kekkity, the outrageous evil bitch is contemptible
I actually dont doubt that
Effective in killing and maiming, so they arent lying
Even if it is made by Pfizer is a curse
Pelosi Appears to Break Promise to Democrats to Leave Leadership After 2022
Joel B. Pollak13 Dec 2021
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) promised Democrats in 2018 that she would only lead her caucus for two more terms if she was elected by her caucus after the party won the 2018 midterm elections.
She now appears ready to break that promise, according to reports.
In December 2018, exactly four years ago, Roll Call reported:
Under an agreement reached with seven Democrats who opposed her speaker bid, Pelosi will back term limits for the top three Democratic leaders. The limit she has agreed to will prevent her from serving as speaker beyond another four years.
“This proposal, which was developed by Members who care about the institution of the House of Representatives, would provide that Members in senior leadership positions can serve 3 terms with an additional term with two-thirds support of the Caucus,” Pelosi said in a statement. “It would include the two terms of the Democratic Majority from 2007 to 2011.”
The proposal will be brought before the Democratic Caucus for a discussion and a vote by Feb. 15, the California Democrat said.
“I am comfortable with the proposal and it is my intention to abide by it whether it passes or not,” Pelosi said.
Yet CNN reported Sunday evening:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi will stay until at least after the midterm elections, extending her nearly 20-year run as the House’s top Democrat after she turns 82 and, perhaps, beyond.
She is planning to file and run for reelection in her San Francisco district next year — at least for now — in keeping with her pattern of deciding about staying in Congress after the elections, when she likely will have won an 18th full term.
And sources familiar with Pelosi’s thinking say she isn’t ruling out the possibility of trying to stay in leadership after 2022, despite her original vow to leave as the top House Democrat. She’ll devote much of next year to raising money for Democrats as they try to hold their narrow majority, those sources tell CNN, adding to the nearly $1 billion her office calculates she has already raised for Democrats in her time as leader.
Pelosi’s promise was key to securing the support of hard-left “progressives” like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), who had initially seemed to oppose Pelosi’s bid to take the gavel back.
Her only chance of keeping her promise is to lead her party to defeat — and even then, she may still vie to lead House Democrats, as she did after losing the House in 2010.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/12/13/pelosi-appears-to-break-promise-to-democrats-to-leave-leadership-after-2022/
Remember when Trump would say, re-elected in 2020, 2024, 2028, 2032, i think we need to keep saying it to drive them crazy
https://twitter.com/nedryun/status/1470766617164402694?s=20
This is why the dems are pushing the texts as the worst thing that could happen
https://twitter.com/Surabees/status/1470760302736293904?s=20
https://twitter.com/SamGH98239545/status/1470580722159206400?s=20
https://twitter.com/hpmacd/status/1469728947583729677?s=20
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1469565970578829314?s=20
It doesnt, liberals only have to read Trumps name to go beserk, they lost all logic a long time ago
It wont matter if they apologize, theyve lost millions of people for life
Posted on October 18, 2013Researchers FindWhites More Altruistic Than Other Races
Richard Lynn, American Renaissance, October 18, 2013
It has sometimes been suggested that whites are more altruistic than other races. Whites welcome other races into their homelands in the United States, Canada, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, but blacks do not welcome other races into their homelands in Africa. In fact, in Zimbabwe blacks have expropriated whites and in South Africa blacks murder whites on an extensive scale.
Recent evidence for greater altruism in whites than in other peoples has been published by Lisa Leslie and her colleagues at the University of Minnesota. They examined race differences in charitable giving as an expression of altruism (Leslie, Snyder & Glomb (2013). They studied charitable giving in a sample of 16,429 employees in a university. 54% of participants were female. Most participants were staff (78%) rather than faculty. The breakdown of the sample was Asian (6%), Black (5%), Hispanic (2%), Native American (1%), White (84%), and non-resident alien (3%). They gathered data on the amount each employee donated during the organization’s annual month-long charitable giving campaign.
Employees were invited to donate to charities for alleviating or eliminating poverty, the support of education, and the treatment of illness. In examining the race differences in the amount of charitable giving, they controlled for salary, position, and age because these are likely to affect the amount of charitable donations. They found that women donated $31 more to the workplace charity drive than did men, consistent with other research showing that women are more altruistic than men They also found that all the minorities donated less to charity than did whites by an average $26. However, blacks gave more than whites to the black charity. These results show that whites are more altruistic than other races in giving more to charities that support all races. Blacks support their own race through charitable giving but provide less support than do whites to other races.
https://www.amren.com/news/2013/10/researchers-find-whites-more-altruistic-than-other-races/
How does one find small churches that are not 501 c3’s
Im so sorry for your loss. God Bless you and your family
As much as we love Trump, he’s not a person to fuck with, and the dems know that, its the reason they are so desperately trying anything
Doubling down when youre losing is not a good strategy