>>1519360
Correct!
But I bet you never heard their plans about how they'd delay the election.
This document details how COBALT has been delivered to operatives in the Seattle area.
ALREADY DELIVERED!
THERMOBARIC Bombs buried in fracking wells.
ALREADY INSTALLED
ZIKA delivered to operatives
And more!
This was more than a delay tactic, this is DOMESTIC TERRORISM
ATTN BO BV BAKER
Post Selected for NOTABLES NOT included - WHY?
Original post: >>1518714
Post by BV for Notables: >>1518773
WHY IS THIS BEING DELETED FROM NOTABLES?
The first 3 pages of this 7 page doc were included in Notables in bread #1905 TODAY.
These are the last 2 pages.
Sauce is included with the original post:
https://www.scribd.com/document/328377223/False-Alien-Invasion
HOW CAN THIS INFO BE SELECTED FOR NOTABLES AND NOT BE INCLUDED?
That's a fabulous explanation.
Sauce on the fake doc?
I contacted Benenson who produced the doc for Clinton Foundation. They did not return my request for comment.
A company who receives bad press will do ANYTHING to clear their name yet Benenson DID NOT make any attempt at clearing their name. HIGHLY SUSPECT.
So if you have sauce on its illegitimacy, please post that. It would help this Anon understand.
I posted it 2 weeks ago. Nothin.
The first 2 pages were posted in Notables TODAY in bread# 1905 post >>1517019
The last 2 pages which include the damning evidence was posted today and selected by BV for Notables, yet not here. They say it's fake but no sauce to back up 'fake'. WTF is going on?
If you post pgs 1&2 in Notables as REAL, why ignore the rest of the doc and imply it's fake?
NOT making sense!
And no- I don't glow.
No, I am not a nigger.
No I AM not a shill.
Been here with ya since October.
I wrote to Benenson for comment. They did not answer my request which is odd considering they would want to clear their name.
How do we otherwise determine its legitimacy?
Seems including it in Notables gets more eyes on it- someone to do more digging to vet the info, no?
This was selected for Notables as the first 2 pages were in Notables early this am (not this Anon).
Almost like it's being ignored on purpose yet NO SAUCE on how it is determined 'fake'.
That's what we do! Get eyes on it in Notables so info cam be dug!
PLEASE post sauce on its fakery if you have it!!!!
NOT INCLUDING IT is not an answer if you cannot vet that it isn't real.
THIS is what Anons do. Give us the opportunity to vet it and include these last pages to the Notable another Anon posted earlier today in #1905.
Ok. To be fair- I do not read everything posted here. No one can; there's simply so much info.
I had never seen this prior to discovering it 2 weeks ago. Now other Anons are replying to this post saying they too have seen these docs, one as early as 2016. Why can this not be vetted then?
I'll let it go but I know there has to be a way to determine it's validity or not. I'm simply not that Anon who can find the info.
I did contact Benenson but they did not return comment.
ThanQ Anon and I do understand what you have shared. I don't understand the Persistence and ego comment. I could care less about my ID or any attachment of my person to a notable or not! I AM NOT a corsicon and my ego does not need it!
If this doc is valid, it is the most important piece of evidence against hrc so far, imo. THAT is why I persist; it's that important.
The only way to get it vetted is to get more eyes on it and that means sticking it in notables. I'll let it go as there isn't enough interest in verifying the document, or so it seems.