>>1518722

Don't you all get it? You don't WANT this ruling on POTUS v twitter blocks to be struck down.

This declares twitter (and by extension, all social media) to be a medium of political discourse - the town square, if you will. This is the basis by which the precedent will be set in the courts to halt companies from shadow banning or otherwise favoring specific narratives.

>>1519920

yep, I just got home from work and havn't caught up on the last 14 hours of bread yet. lots to eat - got garlic?

Anyway these also:

>>1519779

>>1519825

>>1519848

>>1519850

>>1519878

>>1519585

>>1519748

>>1519669

>>1519758

BAH!

linked to wrong original somehow.

FML

anyway responding to: >>1519921

>>1520062

Incorrect yourself.

I said the 'basis' for which precedent 'will' be set.

It will still have to be challenged by POTUS and go to SCOTUS, whereby it will be upheld (POTUS 'loses') and it will 'then' be the precedent by which further rulings are based off of.

>>1519914

notables are largely garbage now days. Good idea on paper, bad in practice - just basically a great way to slide/shill now.

>>1520194

I left off giving any attention to the q-larp-fags a long time ago. not worth my attention.