>>15196555 pb

Some leftists give lip service to the Bill of Rights. Some are outright Stalin supporters / Xi supporters America Haters.

The Bill of Rights supporters have seemed to have disappeared, on their side?

Among those whom it hasn't, have turned Rights.. So there's a split of the Progressive / Dem Party fer sure.

And same with the Republicans; between the Trump supporters and the corrupt.

Amazing. Ron read the Dominiion Manual. Right it the manual it details the "features" which allow cheating.

The cheaters grew bold over time. So many years getting away and no one checking?

Must 've been shallow support all along?

>>15196575 pb

Without fixing the vote one will be blocked from checking the MassMedia and the bio-warfare?

>>15196627

>>15196621

Towers is't laughing

Wasn't he later discredited by being found drunk in a fountain; or somesuch?

>>15196639

>>15196628

Well, for one; The MIT Server brought in CP from East Asia

That's why the FBI - assassination squad of Negroponte had to murder The founder of Reddit, Aaron Swartz.

>>15196672

It was the Media Center Server, so it is reported.

Media Center funded by Black Hat Negroponte brothers.

"Black Bridge" = Negropote.

Swartz was caught downloading from there with a hard connection.

The claimed he was trying to steal library books. Harassed him with idictments threatening 50 years jail time

Then hung in front of his Window in Brooklyn New York

>15196672

perfect example of the jew-haters illogical and fakeness.

A jew Hero fucks up their narrative.

Guess they hate on Zelenko, cause he's Jewish.

They gotta be fake, no one is that stupid?

Except maybe leftist Nazi-s?

Was Aaron Swartz Killed By An

MIT Satanic Child Porn Ring?

By Yoichi Shimatsu

Exclusive to Rense.com

1-15-12

https://rense.com/general95/swartz.html

https://archive.md/f1Fa5

Was Aaron Swartz Killed By An

MIT Satanic Child Porn Ring?

By Yoichi Shimatsu

Exclusive to Rense.com

1-15-12

>>15196666

whats RRN?

>>15196815

sure he signed it, but all those offices are filled with traitors.

Pelosi is in this group. She spoke of it (somewhere) likely cant fine it at the moment

>>15196857

false

>>15196849

>>15196849

"facts" is just a word.

It's one of the buzzwords people trained in sophistry bounce around.

It's like a trigger word; or a magic work; once it's invoked you're supposed to believe everything the con artist says.

Like "science" another trigger word used incorrectly.

or "Conspiracy"

>>15196849

>>15196876

"Love is just a four letter word"

?

>>15196889

>>15196867

Cant prove a lie.

Proof is in the eye of the beholder.

You can truly only prove something to yourself

People, in general, have limited perception / ability.

A mathematician may write a statement which perfectly true and understandable to himself; which others can't read

Most shills re either very stupid or just paid to be obtuse.

Most mistakes are from assuming something, without looking or by an unexamined false premise.

you can't prove anything to anybody, they have to see it themselves

One can only point… Wittgenstein.

"Born in Vienna into one of Europe's richest families, he inherited a fortune from his father in 1913. He initially made some donations to artists and writers, and then, in a period of severe personal depression after World War I, he gave away his entire fortune to his brothers and sisters.[21][22] Three of his four older brothers died by separate acts of suicide. Wittgenstein left academia several times—serving as an officer on the front line during World War I, where he was decorated a number of times for his courage; teaching in schools in remote Austrian villages, where he encountered controversy for use of violence, to girls and to a boy (the Haidbauer incident), during mathematics classes; and working during World War II as a hospital porter in London, notably telling patients not to take the drugs they were prescribed, and also later as a hospital laboratory technician at the Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle upon Tyne.

In the words of a friend and literary executor, Georg Henrik von Wright, he believed that

his ideas were generally misunderstood and distorted even by those who professed to be his disciples. He doubted he would be better understood in the future. He once said he felt as though he was writing for people who would think in a different way, breathe a different air of life, from that of present-day men.[23]"

I think he's related to the banking Maiers, of Austria.. Very big banking family

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Wittgenstein

"On Certainty" published after he was dead. Incomplete system.. Since there is no complete system of philosophy? Gödel showed that.

All systems are open systems.

Part of why Hard AI is a pipe - dream

>>15196930

>you can't prove anything to anybody, they have to see it themselves

you can't prove anything to anybody, they have to see it themselves

Freedom of conscience.

A Proof is seen, rather than imposed.

>>15196930

Phenomenology

At base everything is subjective.

The idea there are "facts" i.e. "the objective" is disputed.

A "fact" has to be accepted.

The "subject" the person sees it, or not, as the case may be?

Everything rests upon the subjective.

That's ur premise.

>>15196943

So-called "Facts" can definitely lead to the truth.

>>15196938

no, truth is dependent upon perception but only as far as, our only contact with it , will be via our perception.

Our perception defines all we can know.

Truth will stand, weather seen or not.

One person can be correct / right standing against millions who are wrong.

Majority wrong happens a lot.

Some people are able to see more than other.

that all it is.

People can be blinded by ignorance or delusion but that won't change truth, which abides.

Does it matter if you see it or not? No, it stays the same.

Truth is ownself-illuminating.. it stands by its own existence. One sees it or not.

One can try to show it, but we can only see it by grace, when ignorance is destroyed or removed.

Very immature to claim "I have the facts. I am science. Believe me.' "Or I have facts" without actually backing up anything; just claims. We see that a lot.

If you understand all truth is subjective, one can get farther. At some point you have to have conviction. That's where many people fail.