Anonymous ID: 368d66 May 23, 2018, 1:57 p.m. No.1520615   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1520312

Well then, wasn't there a recent ruling, stating Potus can't block followers? Maybe somewhere within that ruling, it could be flipped around onto @Jack? Maybe b/c of the ruling it openned a back door for F of S and twatter being held to different rules/regs. Just a quick thought without any sauce.

Anonymous ID: 368d66 May 23, 2018, 2:17 p.m. No.1520801   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1520520

I don't recommend either but it is slightly possible they are also "playing a part in the show". I've read Q's posts, maybe some people's analysis is missing the Q or queue. Q is a doubling meaning also! Like when he/they post, it sets in motion the next "act"