was infiltrated before Q left - why the "clean up the ship" request in October 2020. infiltration was from that Summer. QR has always been under attack from both within and without. Bakers are the obvious target because without them, notables don't get generated.
Milgram was very liberal and did not ask the questions needed to discover what separated those who complied to the end (2/3) from those who refused once the expt looked dangerous (1/3). Claimed in ONE SENTENCE in his book on those expts that there were "no differences" observed.
NO WAY THIS IS TRUE.
But he never asked -
Afraid of the answer, i imagine (like maybe those with religious faith might say no to an immoral request, even when from a whitecoated "expert"?)
Obedience to Authority, by Stanley Milgram
see
The obedience expts done by Milgram were in response to psychologists supposedly wanting to know why people obeyed the nazis. but since they were libtards who tend to wanna say that all people are sheep (and not to realize that the ability to resist coercion can be CULTIVATED) - those like Milgram always designed their expts so as to show people are sheep.
Ditto for Elizabeth Loftus memory expts and those done by Kahneman and Tversky later. They are all secularized efforts TO SHOW HOW FLAWED PEOPLE ARE (along the same lines as those now advocating for new, improved version: 'cyber-humanity'.
ONE THIRD consistently do NOT obey once it's clear that the expt is dangerous.
Replicated many times.
WHO ARE THIS ONE THIRD?
Mebbe we know some of them…..
>"most people"
no - because one third is not "most people"
but it's a sizable number
Matthias Desmet says about 1/3 of the people stand up and say no (same as Milgram), the rest comply. But of that 70% that comply, half or less are "true believers" - the others can be swayed. They're like the #walkaways, right?
Bans by bv are inconsistent and periodic, there's no real logic other than personal preference. Purpose is probably just to cause Soros-style chaos/disruption. doesn't really matter who or what is banned.
I don't think Milgram needed to make up the figures - people do comply to a certain extent and there were a lot of replications under different conditions. (It was harder in the 1960s to get away with data fudging than now - kek.)
Your figure of 80% - well, Milgram's figure was 67%. And Desmet's figure is about 70%. Not so different.
Psychology field is ultra "liberal" - they hate conservatives and conservative values.
used to have a California Fascist Test in the 1950s (which included homosexuality as one of the traits to look for - before that became unfashionable).
https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/RWAS/
F-scale
personality test
The California F-scale is a 1947 personality test, designed by Theodor W. Adorno and others to measure the "authoritarian personality". The "F" stands for "fascist".Wikipedia
BTW, does the name Adorno sound familiar?
SEE
https://communism.fandom.com/wiki/Theodor_W._Adorno
Desmet got well known from being on Corona Cmte vids. Like Desmet's mass hypnosis stuff but he's real pessimistic about the future, too much of a European academic imo. Corona Cmte also had two other psychologists - Ariane Bilheran and Meridith Miller - who are more optimistic (like Reiner F). see qresear.ch for posts.
midazolam - UK's version of remdesivir, except particularly targeting the old.
O'Looney is a brave guy. Articulate, too.
STOLEN
ha-ha-ha-ha
If it weren't so dank, would reply 'variety is the spice of life'. End result is the same.