Anonymous ID: d85398 May 23, 2018, 3:24 p.m. No.1521398   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1560

>>1520422

>>1520448

 

See how destructive they are.

That's what they are hired for. That's what they are paid.

"Jones" has earned every $$$ spent putting him where he is.

 

They win people with emotion and fake sentimentality.

And because people believe they are the only game in town.

 

If you are not controlled, yeah they will take you out.

Now that "Jones" is exposed to more people, he must be shitting in his pants. Couldn't happen to a better guy.

 

Go here for moar Hicks-Jones if you really want to delve

https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1086549.html

 

If someone is enamored of a "Star" it hard for them to see different.

"Jones" uses many techniques to control his audience; including intimidation and attacks on those who don't step in line with what he says.

 

He never honestly takes a question nor answers one.

Anonymous ID: d85398 May 23, 2018, 3:34 p.m. No.1521485   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1512

1521137

 

>>1521123

They argument "They wouldn't do that"

is untrue. Because they did.

 

"If they really did that they wouldn't put that in our face."

 

Oh really.

 

Is that why ~"their ostentatious display of their symbols [feat] will be their undoing?"

 

Logic

"They *wouldn't have done it"

doesn't address the issue of : "did they actually do it or not?"

Anonymous ID: d85398 May 23, 2018, 3:41 p.m. No.1521544   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1584

>>1521103

 

Nope. Media Credibility is not about voting or a popularity contest. totally comped.

 

Sound very scary.

Absolute fraud.

http:// mileswmathis.com/musk.pdf

 

"Why I don't believe in Elon Musk"

Anonymous ID: d85398 May 23, 2018, 3:46 p.m. No.1521596   🗄️.is 🔗kun

1521512

 

Found a bot that doesn't know english.

Surprised.

First I found the post went missing.

Wierd. We're really hitting a nerve with this Sandy Hook stufff.

 

They go absolute apeshit nuts over it.

Must be connected to pedo rings?

Anonymous ID: d85398 May 23, 2018, 4 p.m. No.1521734   🗄️.is 🔗kun

1521137

 

>>1521123

 

They argument "They wouldn't do that"

 

is untrue. Because they did.

 

"If they really did that they wouldn't put that in our face."

 

Oh really.

 

Is that why ~"their ostentatious display of their symbols [feat] will be their undoing?"

 

Logic

 

"They *wouldn't have done it"

 

doesn't address the issue of : "did they actually do it or not?"

 

>>1521512

I've read this over ^^^^ a few times and now it makes sense to me. Yeah, it's a narcissistic trait of psychopaths. And their judgment is often poor. They do things which will give themselves away because they are proud of themselves.

 

[raised eyebrow]

 

cf "The Mask of Sanity" by Cleckley [free online?]

 

Their peculiar odor. They like to put it in public