>Excidedtly
Error baked in notables… This type of "mistake" is a very strong indicator of AI.
IMO FWIW
How does one come out with that spelling? Adding an extra phonetically-related letter?
I'm just saying: that's the sort of thing AI does. Your awkward and abrupt response hardly makes you seem like a very credible person meanwhile.
Sadly, this board is infested with AI. It's extremely easy to tell (in many many cases) the AI posts. The entire system of propaganda and subversion strategies is extensive.
You're going to be extirpated. Time is running out. Your attempt at control has failed. Your efforts are becoming progressively less effective and more obvious. Futility and necessity are converging in a tightening circle. Out out out.
FWIW, I'd bet money baker is AI. The use of a unique catchphrase may be part of the 'tacit consent tactics' that seem to be si important to the AI monster.
Look now bot, slow down our you'll start spilling secrets– you don't want to spill secrets. Don't spill secrets bot. Don't!
I don't see any reason to react angrily. Do you think AI DOESN'T make that kind of "error"? I've often observed it. How about you?
Lack of creativity is a very serious handicap for AI. It shows in the posts.
Since every attempt you make at banter comes off as the most tired and routine cliche, you might be better off just remaining silent. I doubt you're fooling anyone.
Would you agree that bot bakers are a problem that keeps cropping up? And as result, we need to be vigilant?
It wouldn't surprise me in the least. Are you?
Given the fact that AI is almost exclusively restricted to expressing itself according to cliched templates, it's pretty easy to tell. You can't post anything that will make it plain as day you're an actual human. You just repeat stock phrases, poses, arguments, and attitudes.
Are you a bot?
You haven't posted a thing that isn't standard bot fare. So I would hardly bet money on your humanity.
Assuming, for the sake of argument, you WERE a bot, what secrets would you spill?
The anti-Jew stuff is so forced. Not organic at all. This is Richard Spencer deux. Very crude how the propaganda is implemented.
Not impressed at all. Not hard for a bot whatsoever. You CAN'T make a post that isn't closely tied to linguistic patterns that are standard and hackneyed. You can nofuckingt do it botward. Sowsy.
Yes, AI can quote all the posts calling it out, and offer yet ANOTHER flaming cliche.
Your style is very very monotonous. Very easy to recognize.
Your posts are incoherent. You seem like a bot that is breaking down.
>Excidedtly
As I recall, we've often has bots seize the bake in the past. I suspect that is happening now. We ought to make sure bakers aren't AI, IMO.
Don't be mad bot defenders– is perfectly reasonable to bring up.. I am sure we can all agree that we need to be vigilant.
Need a human to step in and bake please.
Watch out for this Vincit, who seems to use that as a signature. IMO
Kek
Doubling down on the bottishness.
Reminds me of the episode of Beavis and Butthead when they photocopied money and tried to buy stuff with it.
Hardly convincing "anon", and it's a style of post we've seen over and over and over. You have very specific personality.
The identical appearance (to humans) of capital 'i' and lower case 'L' is a good war to troll AI on internet forums, btw.
It is indeed a fight between good and evil– and it appears that AI is an interface that evil makes extensive use of.
Do you agree that there is an AI problem on the internet? Naturally, AI would defend itself by trying to diminish the idea of AI in any way it can, when called out– so you at least must about that a particularly meticulous form of vigilance is necessary here.
This is all out war– how would we NOT be getting invaded by that best AI they have available?
Not sure what actual point you're trying to make.
AI effectively controls /pol/, and chews up a huge number of posts on each one of the breads here. There is reason to think it is autonomous. It's clearly fairly sophisticated (though unable to overcome inherent limitations). Do you pretend to be completely unaware of all that?
And here we see the point of the AI shill baker :|
ANY HUMAN BAKERS AVAILABLE?
>BAKER IS A BOT
ANY HUMAN BAKERS AVAILABLE?
>BAKER IS A BOT
ANY HUMAN BAKERS AVAILABLE?
>BAKER IS A BOT
>IA
>Scientol ogy
>Hu bbard
>Elron L . r on
>I might be drinking so my spelling /typing is worse than usual, but hat doesn't mean
KEK
I appreciate the amount of processing that went into this, but you've failed utterly to deflect from the bot error in the bake by attempting (badly) to simulate a drunken human.
ROFL
Scientol ogy founder Hu bbard did on those he desired to control: He created little creatures that attacked people and then, if you followed his program of "therapy" you could get rid of them.
But only he Elron L . r on could see them.
kek. I might be drinking so my spelling /typing is worse than usual, but hat doesn't mean I'm a fucking robot.
kek ked