just spell out amazon dot com. the site is blocked.
>Revelations 2:9 quote top right for example is false quote of scripture to replace "Jews" with "Judahites".
this is acknowledged in the top left that you dismiss "jew is a 17c mistranslation"
so, not a valid criticism. You're lecturing the writer on something he's already acknowledged.
>Bottom quote in upper right section is just one person's opinion which contradicts what almost all Jews today don't accept let alone read.
Talumd is the basis for modern "Judaism" but it is sutdied by the Rabbis not the everyday jew. This is a basic level concept.
And you haven't said what you mean when you say Jesus was a Jew. Weak rebuttal Mr Lawyer.
ah now I see, You're calling Judahite a mistranslation. But this ignores the stated reason for doing so.
>from Greek as he said, "direct" is a misleading word to add in
>pre-17c
>not translated as Jew
good job proving him right keep going
doesnt look like you did, and whats worse you think kikes dont practice the Talmud
according to this page, the Greek original text is indeed as claimed in the meme
>https://www.biblehub.com/text/aaaNT/revelation/2-9.htm
>picrel
Do you disagree with this?
loudaious looks very clearly like Judean and/or Judahite. Which is the entire basis for the wordJew: obscuring which of those 2 you refer to.
if he got the century wrong, so what? You dodge important points for immaterial details like you dodge the oven