(pb) >>15226747
>YUP seen that video along with others. Not sure i believe it like i said but keeping an open mind about it.
The timeline is inferred in the bible. Many dots connect.
(pb) >>15226747
>YUP seen that video along with others. Not sure i believe it like i said but keeping an open mind about it.
The timeline is inferred in the bible. Many dots connect.
And this is the real Antarctica. The real one. The one hidden by the Treaty.
Why would the legal firm representing Hillary Clinton (to the Durham probe) step-in to represent Igor Danchenko in his criminal indictment?
The only logical reason would be for Danchenko to represent a legal risk to the interests of Hillary Clinton, likely through the direct association between Hillary Clinton and Charles Dolan, Danchenko’s collaborator and the liaison to Chris Steele from the Clinton campaign.
As a result of the Durham indictment, we know Igor Danchenko was working closely with Democrat Party public relations executive Charles Dolan to funnel the fabricated source material to Chris Steele. The Clinton team’s communication and contact with Charles Dolan would represent a legal risk to Hillary Clinton.