>>15227553 (lb)
Oh God no, the counter bullshit police are on to me, whatever will I do?
That's right, blaming the sane people has gone way over the line. And without those protesters, the NWO vax brigade would have already won, and rolled over the world. Show the data! And if they can't, make them admit it! And then arrest them!
But wait, we were just told that this helps the bad guys when the good people take to the streets.
Correct. As the one Aussie's shirt said, FUCK YOU MAKE ME
Anon, I owe you a debt of gratitude. Am turning over a new leaf in my life, resolved to use less hard language. Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to advance myself. Until a couple of weeks ago, I would have called you a worthless, cocksucking son of a bitch. But that is all behind me now.
No Catholic here, but I know an intelligent, righteous man with courage when I see one, and Vigano fits the bill. He is out there forcefully arguing our cause, and actually arguing the cause of all decent people everywhere. Someone has to say the things he is saying, and very few others are standing up.
You get fucking real, you make zero sense. Without open, public pushback, they sweep the field and own us all. Speaking of which, WTH do you think anons are doing here, if not constantly pointing out the BS. Earth to you.
Bergoglio has been a vicious individual for his entire life, and him coming out as full commie is no surprise to anyone who has watched his career. Will point out that Vigano IS blaming the Papacy, openly calling out the fake Pope, he of the Pachamama crap and NWO groveling. He calls them all out, Frankie just being one. When I read Vigano's public messages, I think, "He said it as well as anyone could have done it, and he does it over and over again."
Believe Vigano was on this board at one time, and anon had an exchange with him. Told him (or someone) that I agreed with everything he said, except that he kept coming back to the Queen of Heaven stuff, that he simply could not stay away from it. He said can't we put that aside and work together against the great evil, and I said yes. That is how I feel about it. He is a valiant and worthy ally, and I like having him there. Think that he fully believes the Queen stuff, and that is his right, but he is not trying to make me or anyone else accept it.
We have to accept that the only reason Vigano has a voice is because he has a certain rank within the Roman hierarchy. If he did not, literally no one would listen to him. So there is that. He is voicing his concerns to the entire world, but even more specifically to his fellow Catholics, both laity and priesthood. He MUST address them within that context, and the large majority agree with him.
It is not overlooked. It is there on the side. I look at him, and see a man head and shoulders above most, and a man who is fighting the good fight, knowing they could off him at any time. He is IMO a sine qua non in the larger battle. Imagine you are facing the Brits at Lexington, and the man beside you is a professed Christian, but of a different sect. Will you tell him you don't want him there, to get out of the line? 99.9% would say no.
And yet the underlying theme of this discussion is whether all opponents of the present great evil should work together during this life or death exigency, and address their differences later. To wit, would we rather be "right" and dead, with the world cemented into the beast system, or would we rather stand shoulder to shoulder, defeat the demonic enemy, and see how it shakes out afterward, with information that will be released at some point.