>Anons, always check the primary sources.
>Avoid 2nd hand "He Said" BS
That's why anon posted the video yesterday and again today - people discussing/arguing over the twatter title not the actual words he said.
As with POTUS' rally speeches, it pays to watch and really listen, preferably more than once.
What was their favorite vehicle?
Because it's pushed as real (to make anons look stupid over zero sauce fan fiction), not as parody.
POLLSHIT
1000 people polled does not equal the view of 335+ Million Americans.
https://charleskochinstitute.org/app/uploads/2021/12/Polling-results.pdf
>I have never seen anyone push it as real.
Anon has, plenty of times. They use the part of the diclaimer about 'lawyers advice', and usually add no one can prove it isn't true…(when no sauce is provided).
If it turns out in the end to be true, so be it, KEK! But I'll not feel bad arguing against those who push it as real now, with no sauce.
> while saying future anons should not be able to read it and decide for themselves. Are you the arbitor of truth?
Not what I said - I said those pushing it as real now.
> Ignore proof presented
I'm not seeing any proof being presented other than what anons would like to be true. That's my point. I'm not particularly bothered about RRN being documented here, just that position that it IS REAL NOW. Feel free to point out any obvious proofs I've missed from the RRN articles. What anon wouldn't WANT it to be true?
I'm well aware of future proves past anon. As I've said before, but maybe not clearly enough - my problem is with it being pushed as REAL NOW - without that proof.
Do anons not require sauce anymore
? And if that comes down the line, then great!!
I wasn't changing what you said, I was trying to clarify my position with RRN - you already said you haven't seen it pushed as real - many anons have.
I've already said I don't object to it being documented here, as you say, it is related to Q topics .
How it's handled if in notes would be important, else it will likely be used against the board and anons like so many other unsubstantiated things have.
*Plebbit spacing not intentional.
Read all of my posts, retard.
>I have never seen anyone push it as real.
Here's one:
>RRN is Legit
>Binary. RRN is true or it is not. Simple. We do not know now (NOPBODY ON HERE DOES). We will know eventually. That's it.
Yes.