We don't care about your perspective, you've proven yourself blind.
See, you're blind. I'm not vatican shill, just someone who sees your bullshit.
So why are you arbiter of Truth over what I or the vatican shill post? Why are you better than anons who want RRN deleted (which I do not)?
Apparently anyone who posts about the vatican is vatican shill. Good way to keep the Truth about the vatican suppressed I guess.
No, that's my ban notice, and I've used that meme many times. I am bot vatican shill, you're just an idiot who pretends to think were the same person.
You keep missing the point (on purpose), why are you arbiter of truth over what I or the Vatican shill post?
I've said repeatedly RRN shouldn't be censored, we just should be attacked for pointing out it's bullshit. YOU'RE the one who thinks you're arbiter of Truth and does the censoring here.
That ban wasn't for evasion, you didn't know who I was and there was nothing about the vatican (since you falsely claim I'm Vatican shill,) I just agreed that you shouldn't be censoring.
Stop lying and deflecting.
See always lying and deflecting. No I don't, you asked for me to show you. You deflect by any means you can. What was that ban for?
You're the one subverting! Keep the ship clean of illegal shit, not opinions that go against yours.
Right… everyone who knows you're full of shit is a jew right? You're pathetic.
I'm an American of Irish and Scottish descent with some Native American. I believe Jesus is my Savior, the Way, the Truth, and the Life.
Your turn.
At least you admit that's why you attack people and ban them here. They're all Jews though right?
>4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
You mean like labeling anyone who disagrees with you as a specific shill so you can attack and them with that and try to get anons to disregard them?
No, you falsely claim I'm vatican shill, doing EXACTLY what you just posted.
>4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.