>>1523375 prev
Good deal. They will return again, rest assured. I can't understand why they do it. Unless it is for the purpose of discrediting us.
sauce?
Q never said watch the news on the 23rd.
Your's is your stupid fuck! Show me where Q said to watch the news on the 23rd. I'll wait….
I can tag you as many times as you tag me and more, but that still does not prove your fake claim. Neither does calling me names and trying to belittle. YOU SHOW PROOF OR GTFO!
You can't because it does not exist you dumb idiot. You are too stupid to argue with. buh bye.
way too easy for someone without critical thinking skills. Q said watch the news that day. And what day would that be? Did Q said the 23rd? Nope. Did Q say it was going to be 23 days from the start of May 1st. Nope. Did Q say what 23 was in relation to as far as a date? Nope. Did Q even say it would be in DAYS???" Nope.
Please tell me how you figure May 23 was the day Q meant?
I think you are the one who needs to pick your mind up off the floor. I KNOW there are mulitple meanings. I also KNOW better than to assume that the numbers 23 mean an exact date when that was not specifically stated. Every time anons think they know something is going to happen on a specific date and it doesn't. Disappointment runs rampant. expecting something to happen on the 23rd of May based on that one clue alone was foolhearty as best.
So back off your condescending attitude or just KYS.
Not likely anon. It's an active investigation. Been no precedent to unseal confidential information during an active investigation.