Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 7:10 p.m. No.1523426   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1523229 (LB)

bravo, how so many have forgotten Q told us they were fake is astounding,

 

besides, JA being freed was an idea started by Q, in these breads, backchannel is just stealing the idea now, trying to get more patriot points…

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 7:49 p.m. No.1523813   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3845 >>3851 >>3862 >>3898 >>3968

Q, many patriots are becoming confident in backchannel17. they are starting to trust them, your message they were fake wasnt clear enough they have hidden behind a defense you meant the meme was fake not them,

 

how about a definitive statement, is backchannel17 fake?

cause if so they are misleading and dividing alot of us.

 

if they are legit there is still alot of division over the confusion, plz verify or deny them.

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 7:56 p.m. No.1523918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1523862

sooo, you DONT want us to make any effort exposing shills? we are supposed to unite that was Q's instruction, filtering out the shills from the movement is part of that, not on an individual level but for the whole of the Q following, finding ways to prove backchannel is fake is apart of that.

 

unless you are advocating that we allow backchannel to run wild and not challenge them, is that what you want?

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 7:58 p.m. No.1523943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3990

>>1523898

how so? cause i want expose backchannel as a fraud? because im calling attention to them?

 

or do you actually think bc is legit and your upset im questioning that?

 

either way you seem just upset that im questioning…..

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 8:04 p.m. No.1524009   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1523968

>you think you are going to make any headway advancing backchannel

thats really strange you leap to that conclusion considering my goal was just the opposite,

 

they need to be deligitamized further because there are many falling for them, especially lately,

 

thats exactly what my post is calling attention to.

 

but it feels like your just upset they are being mentioned at all. like the others you seem to want no attention on them at all….

strange…. if we do that we allow them to continue to mislead followers as they are in large numbers right now….

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 8:12 p.m. No.1524078   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1523990

>everyone knows

if that where the case there would be no issue here, and they wouldnt have 13000 followers…. their followers should be declining if their legitimacy had been well enough destroyed, instead they gain more and more.

 

everytime i try and redpill their followers on Q calling them fake, they cling to the defense mentioned before, the meme was fake, not the channel itself. this confusion is giving them over ten thousand followers….

 

 

whats the vid? i must have missed this.

Anonymous ID: cb01c0 May 23, 2018, 8:16 p.m. No.1524142   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1524044

pamph isnt even present, pamph never leads people here, that is "magaswaga" talking, he is the one who has on occasion lead people here, he usually tells them to never post only lurk, and he usually directs them to the etiquette thread first.

 

but ya he probly shouldnt be doing that either,

 

nonetheless blame the one speaking not the owner of the stream who isnt even present at the time.