'мuн saтаn
clueless
why do you believe them?
astana воund.
lie
define they please.
paul spoke to specific societies at specific times.
each different letter was in response to different problems with different people in different places.
the fact that the letters to paul are not extant can not be overstated.
pauline doctrines are best assumed single case specific.
the church has been misled.
over simplification eases simple minds.
you do not even have one true report of history.
pontificate in your ignorance.
keep thinking you are not just one more controlled opposition puppet.
the difference is,
one is aware of one`s вıases.
you, ноwever, are fucked either way.
Revelation 22:18
For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:
it does not say it can not be changed…
only that those doing so are in mortal danger.
<and there is only one translation.
checked
it is cohesive and straightforward
if you know Him
it is the key to reality
but few put the time necessary in to obtain understanding.
there is no data on antarctica
nothing at all
you get paid to shill dead ends?
buzz aldrin deleted tweet does not any thing explain.
everything else from vril to agartha is swiss cheese memory holed.
provemewrong.jpg
He is torching reality enroute to sol system.
flipflop dont cover it.
you killed The Lamb
The Lion Returns
wisdom
yes
He Is Doing it again.
to this universe.
He has Raised up a creature that will see it to the end appointed.
<funtimes
sauce that
^
| тнеre is your answer.
you lack sufficient data to judge paul.
that has been amended.
you will likely not see
it.
&?
the key to understanding it (even in it`s present form) is lost to these last generations
alas
donot be so certain you understand what a "demon" is…
for you likely do not.
you are not wrong in aspect though.
checked
a thing many donot know of faith
the implications are interesting…
if one can see them.
romans 12:3
For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith.
prove there is one verifiable datum concerning antarctica.
the burden of proof is on you, cochise.
<proving an negative is labor intensive
know a thing by it's absence.
the fact of no reliable data tell one all one needs to know.
hearsay, genius.
at least one tells the truth instead of endless supposition in order to support one`s false self image.
one made no claim.
the other did.
that it had antarctic data.
it did not.
just moar hearsay said here.
neuschwabenland ist undurchdringlich dunkel.
one cannot prove an negative, as you should know.
the burden of proof is on the claimant.
proof
flight lists, not tweets.
have you considered they may be trolling you?
the truth buried under that ice is two things
reality altering
unknown
that is all that is known
reality altering proof?
the amount of energy they expend hiding the black sun,
for lack of an informed descriptive.
unknown proof?
the same
all of the stories are nice
especially gœbbels
but just stories with nary an proof.
sorry
checked
you have no idea to whom you speak.
your Lord will tell you if you ask,
one is certain.
your error will be explained to you in time…
the price of your actions will komm due, though.
<sad
łкцнכ
уоц наvə ио auтнority over one.
be damned, ~~bleatingsheep~~
&?
do you judge yourself?