Noticed in our F9 (you) from Q that Q used the word "'Explore,'" and it was the only time that word was used.

So we went to check out the Explorers Program.

This goes way back.

Aside from the destroyed Amos-6 satellite, EUTELSAT and Facebook connections, there are also these F9 launches.

Excuse the Red Bolds

Think this somehow ties into JFK.

Stay with me here.

Here's a few recent launches on an F9

Launch date‎: ‎3 June 2017, 21:07:38 UTC

NICER Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer

Launch date: April 18, 2018

TESS Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite

What these two launches, which were selected together, tells us is that they were looking for high energy x-ray signals presumably from neutron stars. Now, in addition, they're testing a rapid modulation x-ray device, which is used to create an x-ray communications system with gigabit bandwidth communication throughout the solar system.

So, what this seems to spell out is that the NICER satellite is intended to find x-ray communications in space or sources thereof.

And it was ten months later that they launched the TESS satellite to find exactly which exoplanet said communications might be coming from.

They are looking for a planet that supports life and emits/receives high-energy x-ray signals for communications.

Beam of light.

That may seem far out there, but that was the sequence of events and what those satellites are designed to do.

Back to Earth though, this youtuber made an interesting observation about how the failed launch flubbed China's acquisition of the F9.

>>1525003

>>1525003

So this was detected in 2015, a couple of years before TESS or NICER, which seems to suggest that program was put in play for that reason.

The polarization suggests that it was not coming from a neutron star but from a planet. If it was coming from a neutron star, the signal would be scattered by the gasses surrounding the star and its intense gravitational flux.

FRB 150807 is remarkable for its short duration, radio brightness and high degree of linear “polarization”—a property describing the plane of the vibrations that make up the waves. Combining these properties, the new study suggests that the burst occurred in a galaxy over a billion light years away, identified by the Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA) Hemisphere Survey. This is the closest we’ve ever got to pinpointing where a fast radio burst came from.

http://www.newsweek.com/aliens-space-communication-aliens-radio-waves-522681

>>1525003

Why were they called the 'Apollo' missions?

There's this:

http://www.wired.co.uk/article/the-best-ways-to-listen-out-for-aliens

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/aliens-communication-earth-hear-back-time-date-gj-273-system-a8059521.html

https://www.space.com/34824-nasa-x-ray-tech-deep-space-communication.html

And this:

https://www.gaia.com/lp/content/what-did-nasa-really-discover-on-the-moon/

"However, accounts from former military intelligence officials have claimed there is more on the dark side of the moon than NASA is letting on. Karl Wolfe, a technician at the Air Force Tactical Air Command headquarters in Langley, Virginia, analyzed data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, claiming he and his colleagues viewed artificial structures on the dark side of the moon, including radar antennas and structures made by intelligent beings."

>>1525016

Has anyone actually read that POS pastebin crap?

You think that's convincing?

Your text is just as flat as the left's memes.

Yeah. Sorry bud, not going to work.

>>1525016

>https://pastebin.com/dZbP9hCt

This is a really pathetic attempt to discredit Q.

They always try the same cheap old dog and pony show - 'appeal to emotion'.

Do you really think I'm going to read this and be like "Omg Q We BELIEVED IN YOU. I'm so HEARTBROKEN!".

If all you have are allegations and appeals to emotion, you can straight up go fuck yourself.

You claim bakers created Q and are using Twitlers API to get a jump on Trumps tweets.

I'm a codefag, hardcore, and I use their API.

You're a liar, hardcore, and their API doesn't allow you to predict the future.

>>1525418

yeah, and it sucked at appealing to emotion too.

>>1525016

You sound like a bored 13 year old.

>>1525264

>>1525003

>>1525482

>Beam of

"A space force is a military branch that conducts space warfare. Currently, one country has previously had an independent space force. Russia's space force was an independent organisation that existed from 1992 to 1997 and from 2001 to 2011; it was reestablished on 2015 as a branch of the Russian Aerospace Forces.[1] A space force is almost always a part of the air force, which may function as an air and space force or as an aerospace force, as the United States Air Force does."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_force

Also, one is a crater, the other a hole.

Guess which one Apollo 11 landed near.