>>1524887 (last bread)

vague insinuations of disinformation, does not equate verified disinformation, any shill can accuse them of putting out disinfo with zero examples.

if they were doing "alot" as you say, then a single example would not be hard to come by.

"there is no single example" could only be fact if it wasnt happening at all.

so other then your baseless allegation, your only other point is they accept donations

is that bad now? donations no longer allowed? seems to me every time we get into that debate anons by majority settle that donations are ok, its premium subs that are not ok, which is something they dont do.

and im not thumper, i dont even like thumper, but thats just cause he doesnt do any research, hes just a chatter who can read articles...

nice try though, guess again.

>>1525096

the person you are replying to has been copy pasting that junk into the breads for over a week,

as in likely a shill, unlikely to gaf bout anything you say.

all youve said and much more has already been said to him numerous times, yet he still copy pastes the same tired old post.= unreasonable=shill..

>>1525346

bullshit!

pamphlet has never called q fake, pamphlet has never fallen for the "q is comped" bullshit.

in fact, pamphlet immediately banned corsi when corsi started saying that bullshit, corsi has been slandering pamphlet over it ever since, get your facts straight anon.

dont do the shills job for them, you are only helping corsi in his goal to slander PA and the soapbox.

>>1525417

thought pamph was just a mod on thestorm back when it began, dont think anyone ever paid much attention to that sub anyway.