Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 12:26 a.m. No.15261334   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1340

>>15261258

I always liked Canoe, so I'm not gonna watch that movie because I heard it's "woke" and generally shit-tier. I'm sorry I even watched that interview because now I don't like Canoe so much anymore. If the next John Wick is "woke", I'm done.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 1:45 a.m. No.15261444   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1445 >>1489

>>15261422

I was hoping for specific names, but that'll do. I guess I'm just having a hard time perceiving all of what you describe as panic. To me it just looks like authoritarianism beginning to take its gloves off. I don't anticipate any relenting, and when I see unmasked "elites" smiling and laughing amongst each other, I don't detect the slightest hint of panic. Just reminds me of that famous footage of the bankers on the balcony sipping champagne as they watched "Occupy Wall Street" play out below. So I was kinda hoping you could point to specific cases where I can clearly intuit that someone is struggling not to shit his or her pants.

 

To show I'm not just doomposting, have this footage of some chick visiting the White House Visitor Center the other week and finding Trump still displayed as POTUS in an exhibit there.

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 2:09 a.m. No.15261485   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1512

>>15261445

>knowing it would have been much, much worse.

 

Assuming you mean "if Trump hadn't won", I'm not so sure I "know" that at this point. It's still very much up in the air as far as I'm concerned. If Killary had come in like Sauron with an army of orcs, I believe the shock of it might have stirred American gun owners into actually enacting their 2A rights. Easy enough to envision a psyop scenario where Q and Q+ had the objective effect of pacifying the American gun owner. Moreover, your answer doesn't address my point about the elites looking as carefree as ever with their maskless shiteating grins. All that said, I hope all of the hopium purveyors are right. I would gladly eat crows for the rest of my terrestrial life for that to be so.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 2:24 a.m. No.15261509   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1527

>>15261489

>School districts calling in the FBI to have parents deemed terrorists.

 

OK now there's a good example. To me, that is not 'beautiful'. It is alarming and appalling, because as brave as the mothers are, I don't see any MEN standing the fuck up and putting a firm stop to it. Nor have I seen any signs that the FBI is being reformed. If shit like that continues, blatantly unconstitutional and therefore illegal violations of natural rights, and the people do nothing to defend themselves from it, then it will only escalate, and next thing you know, just as soon as the fuckers feel safe enough to do it, there will be "terrorist" mothers in federal detention just like the Jan 6ers. Call me a pessimist, but I say my take is a realistic one. Thank you for your considerate answer, though. Have a Hunter meme.

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 2:38 a.m. No.15261536   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1625 >>1669

>>15261512

 

>((They)) want Patriots to break the law

 

When tyrants violate the Constitution and the Rights of the People, said violations equate to violence, especially when they are incarcerating people without due process and, worse still, jabbing schoolchildren without their parents' knowledge or consent. Like it or not, that is VIOLENCE, and against violence, self-defense is not only legal, but morally imperative.

 

>By the book justice is slow but righteous.

 

The Rittenhouse anomaly aside, the Judiciary all the way up to SCOTUS is almost completely comped. How, from such a corrupt legal system, which colluded with media to aid and abet the election steal, do anons honestly expect anything like 'justice' to emerge? I can't see it.

 

>Two wrongs don't make a right.

 

Again, defending yourself, your loved ones, and your society against violent tyranny is not a 'wrong', but in actual fact it is a RIGHT.

 

>The people, with help will ultimately take out the DS with by the book truth and justice.

 

I don't want to repeat myself, but how many judges, and lawmakers for that matter, still have any regard for 'the book', i.e. Constitution?

 

Just pointing out what I see. Do correct me where you think I'm wrong.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 2:44 a.m. No.15261541   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15261527

Anon, I can't say you've convinced me, but you do make a compelling argument. I hope and pray that you are correct and I am mistaken. Nice to have an actual civil conversation that doesn't devolve into ape-hurl-turds shitposting.

 

o7

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 2:52 a.m. No.15261551   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15261543

>Pedophilia can never be defended openly and since that is what drives the worldwide evil they will do anything to keep that truth hidden because once exposed it's fucking over for them.

 

If that is the case, then how does anon explain the ubiquitous sexualization of children in pop culture, as well as attempts in certain parts of Europe to make pedophilia legal? I had always thought their plan was to normalize it so that normies wouldn't mind.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 3:36 a.m. No.15261643   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15261625

>The corrupt justice system can and will very easily be supplanted by military tribunals for treason and sedition crimes

 

Anyone want to pick up where this anon left off? The next question, of how a woke gay af military that by some estimates has lost upwards of half its personnel to jabs and jab-driven resignations is to be expected to play such a role in the Republic's restoration, should be obvious.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 5:26 a.m. No.15261893   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>15261876

>when Trump takes back the WH

 

With a totally rectified and corrected electoral process, and all the departments and agencies overhauled and corrected under the CCP Bidan administration. Got it. Let us know how that works out.

Anonymous ID: 8a073f Dec. 27, 2021, 5:29 a.m. No.15261900   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1935

>>15261881

>>Omg It's a fucking photo that he painted over

>It looks more like a photo with a filter applied to it in Photoshop.

 

It is probably not even a Photoshop filter, because not even Photoshop filters are that shitty. Probably a filter provided by a free online photo editor. Beyond obvious.