dChan
Anonymous ID: f2ecd3 Dec. 27, 2021, 6:36 a.m. No.15262106   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Woman health workerPatriotTraumaSurgeon,MD

@PatrioticTrauma·Aug 3

I'm sorry, 15 part threadThread:Bare w/ me to the end of my thread.

I'm a trauma surgeon. There's something quite unique about my job, I don't take lightly and have profound respect for. What's that? It's the implied societal consent to do what I need to do to save a life. 1/

It's largely the only field in medicine where this "privilege" is given to a physician. Someone comes into the trauma bay after a car accident or gunshot wound, I am given implied consent to take all the "risks" needed to save your life if you are seconds away from dying.2

For other operations, I take time to obtain written consent, explain risks+benefits of surgery. The reason we don't do this in emergent trauma surgeries, is b/c patients dying are not conscious, and b/c the only major risk to your life in this situation, is NOT getting surgery.3/

At that point the rest is on me, my team, + God. Then I take the burden of the risks. Sometimes, the only answer is to open another body cavity, explore, stop the bleed. That's b/c I have implied consent to give someone a last chance to live, even if in the end it is futile.4/

Now don't get me wrong, academic medicine and trauma surgery, for that matter, DEPENDS on studies, discourse, questions, trials. And trauma surgery is no different. Decisions are based on evidence and experience. As it should be. Everything we do is evidence based.5/

NOW I get to my point. We're now living in medical fascism. People are trying 2 make decisions about ur health w/out ur consent when u AREN'T DYING. We have more time than SECONDS to decide what's best for ur health. We have time 2 make good decisions, and not take undue risks.6/

We could debate where c@vid came from, if it's really the flu, why its here, who the players are, why the tests suck, why the numbers aren't consistent, why we're wearing masks. The point is there's a virus that made older and immunocompromised people really sick+people died.7/

But what we are doing now is a crime. We have too many important questions about this v@x based on good evidence to support our questions. We have information coming out of Israel that the 6th month efficacy rate could be as low as 16%. 8/

We have evidence people are getting myocarditis, blood clots, neurological adverse events after the v@x. We now have evidence that there is immune escape, and that these v@x are "leaky" and giving rise to variants. We don't know the long term side effects to adults and kids. 9/

We know BOTH v@xed + unv@xed are getting sick, and in many cases it is mostly the v@xed who are getting sick. We have concerns that these v@x are giving rise to an immunologic phenomenon called antibody dependent enhancement which is making v@xed people's immune system worse.10/

I'm not an expert; I'm the opposite on this topic. But I do know one thing, this is the 1st time in my life, that medicine+science community as a whole r taking risks they don't have the privilege to take. Dare I mention, we have early treatment that doctors refuse to give!! 11/

6:36 PM · Aug 3, 2021·Twitter Web

We're continuing on w/ v@xing people and taking away their freedoms, jobs, and future education, if they don't take it, + silencing those that are asking the good questions. And we are doing this all while we don't know the answer if taking the v@x is more harmful than not. 12/

So to fire people from their job, restrict them from education, segregate based on v@x status…all based on unclear science (and perhaps even harmful science)is purely unjust and dare I say evil. 13/

Because ultimately everyone will be v@xed without their consent, because if you don't you can't exist in the society you lived in. This is not about public health and the common good when we are fighting a virus that we know who it targets, and for which we have therapeutics. 14/

We have AUTONOMY to consent to an experiemtal drug that has unclear scientific efficacy, safety profile, and dare I say, purpose. We aren't trauma patients w/ seconds to live. We are healthy citizens that have the right to think+choose for ourselves and our families. 15/15

Spelling error! Meant to say “bear with me” Woman facepalmingproving 2 things, 1 I’m human, and 2 I’m definitely not an English teacher. Embarrassing.

 

https://twitter.com/PatrioticTrauma/status/1422687786126266369?s=20

Anonymous ID: f2ecd3 Dec. 27, 2021, 6:53 a.m. No.15262161   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2635 >>2820 >>2831

A Myth Is Born: How CDC, FDA, & Media Wove A Web Of Ivermectin Lies That Outlives The Truth

Via RESCUE with Michael Capuzzo

New Mexico officials admit they were wrong: Two people died from covid. NOT from ivermectin. Yet the CDC generated the nation's highest health alert and a thousand fake headlines on false cases.

• Linda Bonvie and Mary Beth Pfeiffer

When a Texas cattleman, seventy-nine, died last September in New Mexico after contracting covid, his family never anticipated the worldwide headlines that would ensue.

• In a ballyhooed press conference, New Mexico Human Services Secretary Dr. David Scrase, the state’s top health chief, announced New Mexico’s first ivermectin “overdose,” soon adding a second fatality allegedly from “ivermectin toxicity.”

Now, Scrase has acknowledged that his repeated, what he called “offhand,” assertions were groundless. Two deaths were not caused by ivermectin, a long-used generic drug that was emerging as a covid treatment. Instead, he said that the pair died because they “actually just delayed their care with covid.”

That is a big difference.

Scrase backpedaled on December 1 in a little-noticed online press briefing and only after we pressed his agency to provide evidence for its claims of so-called “ivermectin deaths.” Officials had repeatedly said they were awaiting a toxicology report on the cattleman’s death. Yet we learned that the report was never even ordered or done, and, moreover, the man’s death was ruled by the state’s coroner as being from “natural” causes.

• Not a single media outlet reported Scrase’s admission, even as dozens, including the The Hill and The New York Times, had eagerly covered his original assertions about ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015.

• “I don’t want more people to die,” read one early headline, quoting Scrase. “It’s the wrong medicine for something really serious,” Scrase said in the Times article.

• Doctors, scientists, and toxicologists worldwide were puzzled by the assertions, because ivermectin is an extraordinarily safe, FDA-approved drug. A fixture on the WHO’s list of 100 essential medicines all hospital systems are recommended to carry, nearly four billion doses have been given in four decades.

• New Mexico became a key player in a broad pattern of governmental deception late last summer to portray ivermectin as dangerous, in tandem with three related developments. Research strongly supported the drug’s efficacy against covid; prescriptions were soaring; and public health officials were single-mindedly focused not on treatment but on vaccination.

• We previously reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s tweeted warning last August against using ivermectin meant for livestock was prompted by incorrect—and unverified—information from Mississippi. Health officials there had posted an alert suggesting the state’s poison control center was deluged with hundreds of calls over ingestion of livestock ivermectin; in reality, we found, four reports were received.

• But, fueled by bits of contorted evidence like this, the anti-ivermectin train was unstoppable. We have now learned that, in the rush to bury a drug described as “astonishingly safe” and long used globally to quell animal and human parasites, FDA was not alone.

• Emails we obtained from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control show that an influential August 26 national health alert on ivermectin was spurred, like the FDA tweet, by a sliver of evidence: just three cases of alleged ivermectin side effects, two involving animal formulations. No patient died; one appeared to have been hospitalized, and one declined any medical help.

• Nonetheless, those three reports, obtained by Atlanta-based CDC from the Georgia poison control center, sealed the decision to issue the nation’s highest-level health warning, according to the emails.

Shortly after learning of three cases, CDC's Michael Yeh writes, “we have evidence of significant toxicity.”

• Referring to planning for the health alert, “the consensus was that unless we’re seeing bad adverse effects from ivermectin, we’d hold off,” wrote a CDC medical toxicity officer, Dr. Michael Yeh, in an August 17 email. “Now it sounds like we have evidence of significant toxicity.”

That email was written seventy-two minutes after brief information on three reports arrived in a separate email.

While CDC’s intention might have been to protect people, the alert is emblematic of what had become a national obsession: Portray an early treatment for covid—whether in the animal or human form—as potentially toxic.

CDC hopped aboard

In an email later that day, Yeh laid out the evidence…..

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/myth-born-how-cdc-fda-media-wove-web-ivermectin-lies-outlives-truth

Anonymous ID: f2ecd3 Dec. 27, 2021, 6:57 a.m. No.15262173   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>15262144

Its stupid when the tests dont work and thus far has any virus been isolated.

 

Btw a lot young salaried workers at a tech business my friend is at, are using “they were around someone with covid”, to skip work and their company keeps tyem out for 14 days even if they test negative

Anonymous ID: f2ecd3 Dec. 27, 2021, 7:08 a.m. No.15262204   🗄️.is đź”—kun

If only this was true, but those that take the jab have proven they are incapable of normal thought processes

 

https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/status/1475180006972268546?s=20