Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:13 a.m. No.1527563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7629

Pyongyang has threatened to scrap the US-North Korean leadership meeting and make the US face “an appalling tragedy.” The remarks came in response to Vice President Mike Pence’s warning on a Libyan scenario for the country.

 

“As a person involved in the U.S. affairs, I cannot suppress my surprise at such ignorant and stupid remarks gushing out from the mouth of the U.S. vice-president,” North Korean vice-minister of Foreign Affairs Choe Son-hui said as cited by state media on Thursday.

 

“We could surmise more than enough what a political dummy he is as he is trying to compare the DPRK, a nuclear weapon state, to Libya that had simply installed a few items of equipment and fiddled around with them.”

 

US officials are apparently continuing with President Donald Trump’s “maximum pressure” approach despite the recent relief in tensions on the Korean peninsula. On Monday, Pence said that if the North’s leader Kim Jong-un tries to play Trump and fails to make a deal on its nukes, it will “only end like the Libyan model ended.”

 

He was not the first high ranking official to mention Libya while speaking about the North’s denuclearization. Earlier US national security adviser John Bolton brought up the “Libyan model” of giving up the nuclear arsenal as well.

 

Yet, less than 10 years after Tripoli surrendered its nuclear research materials to the US in 2003, its government was overthrown, with the help of NATO-led intervention.

 

“In view of the remarks of the U.S. high-ranking politicians who have not yet woken up to this stark reality and compare the DPRK to Libya that met a tragic fate, I come to think that they know too little about us,” the vice-minister said.

 

She also noted that Pence had failed to consider the “terrible consequences” of his statement, adding that his country may “taste an appalling tragedy it has neither experienced nor even imagined up to now” for it.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/427629-pence-political-dummy-nkorea/

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:22 a.m. No.1527663   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7706

>>1527641

It's actually very telling. Apparently you haven't been paying attention. I wonder how he went from should get the Nobel Peace prize to walking away from two deals.

 

Always talking out the side of his mouth.

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:28 a.m. No.1527707   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7722

>>1527684

Freedom is choice. You CHOOSE to follow something YOU have NO idea about. Following blindly and trusting something you have never met.

 

If other Anons CHOOSE to use their own MIND at look at ALL the information; you are just going to have to deal with your uncomfortablity.

 

Put your biceps away there thug for life.

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:29 a.m. No.1527725   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1527706

No it does not. Because it was Russia and others who have been working on the deal.

 

It is called the "Pipeline of Peace".

The Russian Pipeline.

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:35 a.m. No.1527781   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7807 >>7964

The US is essentially irrelevant to the solution of the Korean problem and, if a deal is made between the North and South, the US will be asked to leave, says Daniel McAdams, executive director of the Ron Paul Peace Institute.

 

Donald Trump said during a meeting with the South Korean President Moon Jae-in in the US capital on Tuesday that his much-anticipated summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on June 12 might not happen.

 

Both Washington and Pyongyang have previously suggested they may not be willing to hold talks unless certain conditions are met.

 

RT discussed the situation with McAdams, from the Ron Paul Institute for Peace & Prosperity.

 

Daniel McAdams: It is interesting to see how Trump and his top advisers seem to be at odds with each other. I don’t know if his management style is to create chaos and see if some order comes from it or what in fact may be his style, but a few days ago you saw John Bolton bringing up the issue of the Libya scenario. I don’t believe this was an accident. This is the same Bolton who just before he was confirmed as the president’s national security adviser wrote an article encouraging the US to have a first strike against North Korea. I don’t believe that he has changed his tune in just a couple of months. Here you have him basically talking about Libya as a model for North Korea. We know what happened to Libya: Libya voluntarily gave up its weapons and was overthrown nonetheless. If that is not the red flag to the North Koreans, I don’t know what is. And they did take it as a red flag: they said: “John Bolton is not welcome here. We don’t even want to talk to the South as long as this kind of nonsense is going on.”  

 

RT: Where does the confusion come from?

 

DA: The problem is that Washington confuses the idea of negotiation with the idea of surrender. The meeting for Trump and Kim in Singapore should have been the beginning of a dialogue, of a process. Instead John Bolton and others have laid down the law: Here what you got to do. I think Bolton said: “Tell us where we should send our planes, pick up your stuff and take it away.” So, the whole idea is that you immediately surrender and we give you vague promises in the future making you very rich. If I were North Korea, particularly watching how the US tore up the Iran agreement, if you have any mind at all, you would be very skeptical…

 

RT: Do you think North Korea is taking the talk as seriously as they should knowing how the Trump administration behaves?

 

DA: I don’t think that is the case because I think the US is essentially irrelevant to the solution of the Korean problem. And that may be one of the silver linings – the fact that the Trump administration seems to have no clue what it is doing. The North and South are clearly moving ahead. We saw the historic meeting on the border. We saw the talks progress. Moon was elected to do exactly what he is trying to do. And I think it’s actually the US interventionist neoconservatives who are isolating the US and making us irrelevant which, from the libertarian perspective, is actually very good thing. I think this will go ahead.

 

It’s very important that people understand that President Moon of South Korea is really the most important president here, not Trump. I know Trump thinks it is always all about him, but President Moon is the one who is really in the driver’s seat here…It is possible that South and North Korea could continue to build their relations, there are a lot of economic issues that they could work on, diplomatic issues, reunification of families that have been separated – Kevin Martin, President of Peace Action

 

RT: Is the US ever going to pull out of South Korea? It’s not on the cards, is it?

 

DA: Things happened very quickly. Who would have thought just before December 1989 that the Wall would come down. These things do happen. Historic events do happen.…I think that the ball is in play with North and South Korea and the US is irrelevant. At some point if the deal is made between the North and South, eventually, the US will have to be asked to leave.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/427551-north-south-korea-us/

 

NOBODY WANTS THE U.S IN THE NEGOTIATIONS.

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:50 a.m. No.1527924   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Do you know how much money the Military industrial complex lost with the first peace agreement? lol.

 

Trump is a business man yes?

Promised to change ge the economy around?

But when you economy survives off war and there is a peace agreement.

 

What would a business man do?

Anonymous ID: d805f7 May 24, 2018, 7:56 a.m. No.1527979   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1527964

Typically US. Been at war for 200 years straight and still think they are the peace keepers.

 

Hahahahahaha hahahah. Holy shit. You do realize how ignorant that is. Right?