>>15272298 Monster thread on the coup against President Trump.

Go here for the archive released document on the Nixon Impeachment

https://www.lawfareblog.com/watergate-road-map-unsealed

Lawfare site was FBI lover's favority site to read:fuck this is funny,Kash said Sussman's indictment document from Durham was very damning! Lawfare is filled with laughable twists of what the law is supposed to be

On the Special Counsel’s Weird Prosecution of Michael Sussmann

By Benjamin Wittes

Monday, September 20, 2021, 12:21 PM

… But now Durham has spoken on his own. He has indicted a cybersecurity lawyer named Michael Sussmann for allegedly making a single false statement in a conversation in 2016 with then-FBI General Counsel Jim Baker. The allegedly false statement concerned not Trump or Russia, but whom Sussmann represented when he brought Baker some information about an alleged electronic connection between the Trump Organization and a Russian bank. (Disclosure: Baker is a personal friend and former colleague at Brookings and Lawfare.)

The indictment is, in other words, far removed from the grave FBI misconduct Durham was supposed to reveal. Very far removed. In fact, it doesn’t describe FBI malfeasance against Trump at all, but portrays the FBI as the victim of agitprop brought to it by outside political operatives. It describes the FBI as diligently running down the leads it had been fed by these operatives and then, well, dropping the matter when it learned they had no merit. The misconduct it portrays is an alleged lie by Sussmann that is, at best, wholly peripheral to the substance of the allegations Durham was supposedly peddling.

Even taken on its own terms, the document is one of the very weakest federal criminal indictments I have ever seen in more than 25 years covering federal investigations and prosecutions. It depends in its entirety on the testimony of a single witness who is on the record, under oath, saying something rather different from what the indictment alleges. The indictment itself, as I’ll explain, also contains a number of facts that tend to undercut its central allegation.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/special-counsels-weird-prosecution-michael-sussmann