Many test kits were faulty.
None existing test on the market can accurately distinguish btwn CV and the flu.
Newer versions are being claimed to be better at this per CDC - ummm sure.
Retests coming up positive count as incremental cases but really the same person testing positive after recovery.
Greatly increases the positive cases being reported.
>Frank says, of course they already knew this.
>But it let it slide because that greatly inflated the number of cases (each test = a case).
He's being ass fucked in the comfort of his own abode not jail.
There are over 200 test kits out there a number of which were recalled for faulty responses.
The general PCR RT methodology itself is also faulty as per CDC giving false positives for 12 weeks.
They are shrouding the general errors and pretending they can not differentiate between CV and flu because the existing PCR tests cannot accurately do this (which they omit because this fault multiplied the case count for their narrative).
Only the very detailed testing sequencing (not what the public has been getting via PCR) can differentiate between CV strains.
*NOW
>They are shrouding the general errors and pretending they can NOW differentiate between CV and flu because the existing PCR tests cannot accurately do this (which they omit because this fault multiplied the case count for their narrative).