(summarize and deepen - historical context)

Vince Foster/Death

The untimely Death of Vince Foster was officially ruled to be a suicide. This verdict is a widely disputed

Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park off the George Washington Parkway in Virginia, outside Washington, D.C., on July 20, 1993. Wikipedia's title gives the official narrative. His death was ruled a suicide by multiple official investigations. Note that Wikipedia took the relatively unusual step of censoring some page edits, making the metadata visible but hiding the contents, even to those who know about Wikipedia's censorship

Terming the death of Vince Foster "the story that nobody dares touch," Michael Rivero wrote that it was "the story that ended my career in Hollywood."Some suspect that Foster died from a shot from a small-caliber pistol to the neck and his body was dumped in the park. A book by Christopher Andersen entitled Bill and Hillary: The Marriage claims that Foster and Hillary Clinton were involved in an affair that led to Foster's death.

Variations on this theory abound, including claims that Mrs. Clinton either killed Foster herself or was personally responsible for having him killed.[8] Aides to Hillary Clinton Maggie Williams (formerly of the Children's Defense Fund) and Craig Livingston (a bar bouncer discovered and employed in a security capacity by Hillary Clinton) may have been surreptitiously investigated for the removal of unidentified files from Foster's office before the Secret Service or FBI could secure the premises. Furthermore, three federal judges (David Sentelle, John Butzner, and Peter T. Fay) attached an addendum to Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's Report on Foster's death despite Starr's objection. However, no charges were ever brought forward in connection with any of these allegations.

A suicide note of sorts, actually a draft of a resignation letter, was found torn into 27 pieces in Foster's briefcase after his death. The piece with his signature may never have been found. The text of Foster's note was as follows:

I made mistakes from ignorance, inexperience and overwork

I did not knowingly violate any law or standard of conduct

No one in The White House, to my knowledge, violated any law or standard of conduct, including any action in the travel office. There was no intent to benefit any individual or specific group

The FBI lied in their report to the AG

The press is covering up the illegal benefits they received from the travel staff

The GOP has lied and misrepresented its knowledge and role and covered up a prior investigation

The Ushers Office plotted to have excessive costs incurred, taking advantage of Kaki and HRC

The public will never believe the innocence of the Clintons and their loyal staff

The WSJ editors lie without consequence

I was not meant for the job or the spotlight of public life in Washington. Here ruining people is considered sport

Foster's death was concluded to have been a suicide by inquiries/investigations conducted by the United States Park Police, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the United States Congress, Independent Counsel Robert B. Fiske, and Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr

After a three-year investigation, Starr concluded that Foster's death was a suicide. CNN stated on February 28, 1997, "The Starr report refutes claims by conservative political organizations that Foster was the victim of a murder plot and coverup," but "despite those findings, right-wing political groups have continued to allege that there was more to the death and that the president and first lady [Bill and Hillary Clinton] tried to cover it up." (SEE picture for the rest)

(elucidation)

Beware of the hypnotoad-Consensus trance

That humankind has fallen into the insanity of concensus trance, and lost touch with our true possibilities and functions is a tragedy.

This term may have been coined by psychologist Charles Tart. A consensus trance is used to explain the psychology that requires the (possibly tacit) acceptance of the "Official Narrative" through the absorption of sub-conscious blocking out of unpleasant and unpalatable truths about the world, one's country, society, religion etc., in order to get through the day and concentrate on the deeply established routines of life. It is highly noteworthy just how willing people are to suspend belief in their own senses in order to conform to a group to which they feel allegiance. Robert Heinberg has made extensive use of this in his writings about 9/11 and Peak Oil.

Canadian academic John McMurtry introduced the roughly equivalent concept of the "regulating group mind" in his 2004 paper, Understanding 911 and 911wars.

The facts of 9-11 which are disconnected from are now copiously documented. But why and how these facts are ruled out by the masses and elites at the same time is not explained. The argument has been at the first-order level of the facts, not the lawlike operations on the facts by the collective thought-system that selects, ignores and reconnects them in new form - what I call the “regulating group-mind” (RGM). Only when we understand this meta-level of constructing the facts and their meaning in accordance with their conformity to and expression of a pre-existing structure of understanding can we know what is going on or, more specifically, can we find our way out of the anomalies and disconnects of our era

McMurtry postulates a “regulating group-mind” or socially regulating syntax of thought and judgement which blocks out

-all evidence against its assumptions; and

-the destructive effects which reveal its delusions.

McMurtry underlines the importance of understanding the nature of the regulating group mind, even suggesting:

The RGM may lie behind every systematic social pathology of our era. In each case, it blocks out facts and connections of life-and-death significance, and in each instance, its exclusion is a variation on one life-blind thought regime, the “shadow subject of our era

Mass compulsion schooling is the subject of a concensus trance. People like to believe it is intended to bring out the best in children, not to carry out long term society enginnering. John Taylor Gatto cites Alexander Inglis' 1911's "Principles of Secondary Education" as revealing the first purpose of modern schooling is adjustive - to give children fixed habits of obedience to authority, while the fourth purpose is conformity, to make them as alike as possible, for easy management as citizens and consumers (SEE picture)

(Scientific American, 193 No 5, 31-35)

>>1528487

You can call it collective consciousness or collective intelligence,