Question for all anons

>Does anyone else find it strange that Ghislane got the full sentence?

She had a list of names. She said if she was found guilty she would name everyone to get a lesser sentence. Yet the prosecution had zero interest in getting any information she had. Which tells me Q does have everything. Which then makes sense of anomalies like biden saying "yeah, let's go brandon", his make up glitch, and the fake white house. As well as harris going on Charlamange defending against questions that Joe Manchin is the actual president. I mean 88 million votes and they can't secure an innocent Ghislane verdict? 88 million votes and they can't vet callers for Joe or Charlamange's questions for Harris. These things don't fit the pattern and make my autism scream.

Thoughts please, this shit is bugging the hell out of me.

>>15284874

they are probably all going to thrid world countries dropping off the grid or catching the next flying yamaka to tel-aviv

>>15285050

was way easier to follow with the numbers and lines, thank you for that… you put a lot of pieces together for me. Reminds me of a wiring diagram, linear and logical.

>>15285074

someone feels the need to be heard, nice and organic too… anons don't suspect a thing

>>15285208

>4 lines

>>15285257

kek, go back to /deepdigs