Well HELLO IP hopping BV, nice to see you fuck up once again by admitting those 'anon' comments were you and admitting you're gaslighting and astroturfing anons with intentional consensus crack shilling. You ARE attacking criticisms of RRN, just look at your hostility. You're falsely associating two independent threads of two independent sets of anons. If criticizing site A is wrong, that does NOT constitute proof that criticism of B is wrong. Be honest and answer the fucking question of why do you respond with such 'passion' every time RRN is criticized? What is so goddamn special about RRN and what is your personal interest in it? Sounds like the site is run by an intel agency and you are coordinating with it to defend the narrative Q is leaking to it
"WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?"
"DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?"
"Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected]."