Anonymous ID: a13e64 Dec. 31, 2021, 9:34 a.m. No.15285205   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5221 >>5270

>>15285176

>you admitted

YOU admitted to IP hopping.

Where did I admit? I told you you're making an error when you linked those two posts.

I don't even use those terms 'dibs' or 'tyb'.

>kike

Why is this your repeating tactic? Did you think name calling like a child constitutes an argument?

 

>>15285194

>gaslighting

projection

>ip hop

projection

 

 

Why are criticisms of the narrative Q is leaking to RRN responded to with such attacks?

 

I know the reason.

 

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Anonymous ID: a13e64 Dec. 31, 2021, 9:35 a.m. No.15285208   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5221 >>5234 >>5504

>>15285203

Who works THIS hard to DEFEND the narrative Q is leaking to RRN?

 

Who works THIS hard to attack and smear anons who criticize that narrative?

 

Who is trying REALLY hard to attack Q by associating Q intel to this site?

 

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?

DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?

Anonymous ID: a13e64 Dec. 31, 2021, 9:37 a.m. No.15285213   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15285206

>Unable to prove Q is leaking to RRN

>Attacks anons who criticize the narrative

>calls them names

>lies about ip hopping

>claims victimhood

 

That behavior has mossad written ALLLLLLL over it.