dubs dubs chek'ed
imagine how much effort it too to photoshop exactly the right photo to be a meme from here onwards.
kek
legal
dubs dubs chek'ed
imagine how much effort it too to photoshop exactly the right photo to be a meme from here onwards.
kek
legal
yep
funded by interests, once you get rid of the men, they are easy to control and dominate
fucking idiots
every powerful position around with women and cucks
i think you are the rrn shill.
framing your question will still get you called out
retard
(someone had to say it)
kek
kek
SUMMARY - THE CDC IS NOT STOPPING ITS PCR TEST, IT IS JUST DISCONTINUING ONE FOR A NEW ONE CALLED RT-PCR!!!
==
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/the-cdc-is-not-stopping-use-of-pcr/
The CDC is NOT stopping use of PCR
December 30, 2021 10:28 am by IWB
On 8/02/21, the CDC gave an update to the Lab Alert Issued on 7/21/21 regarding the “withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” ( http://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html), titled “Clarifications about the Retirement of the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCov) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel“ ( http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/multiplex.html?ACSTrackingID=USCDC_2146-DM62994 ), which states for the reason of the change:
“consider transitioning to a test that can generate a result for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2, rather than running separate tests for each virus”
The test they recommend in its place is the “CDC Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay”.. if you click that link you will see, “The CDC Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay is a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test“ ( http://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/multiplex.html)
And as for the question, “is CDC retiring the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel because it has produced inaccurate results?“, the answer they give is, “No.” (see link #1)