>>15314124

Thank you for this. I'll add it to the list :)

>>15314147

> Nick Fuentes

HA

Says about all anon needs to know. Also, Wendy just exposed herself bigly.

>>15314262

>Wendy Rogers hit the alarm and I'm agreeing with her.

If Wendy is backing Fuentes, then Wendy is either stupid AF, or comp'd AF.

>>15314245

PDJT told you he handed Snowden and Assange over to the courts for a reason. In his Candace interview, she tried to take a hard line with PDJT, and he put it to her in a way that had her backtracking like a mother fucker by the time it was over.

Going back and reading the comments from Q should tell you all you need to know. One of these men got an option to come home to a parade or in restraints. The other, Q was tight-lipped about. That means legal problems; big legal problems. It means that everyone's patron saint of journalism isn't who they think he is. This should be obvious for 2 reasons:

1. People with really good shit get droned/MS-13'd.

2. People that helped Assange hack DoD systems get pardoned by Obama.

3. WL is currently ran by DS.

4. WHs "have the source".

>>15314353

Intentionally left this one out to see if anons are paying attention. Good on ya.