Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 8:15 a.m. No.15319860   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15319714. PB

 

Discussion on why movies relisted

I dont want to say this, But I think the dems had set up teams to infiltrate Mar A Lago to shut him up for good on Jan 6, 2022. And all industry was notified to cancel all events because there may be an important funeral planned. Probably crazy thinking but even the date is strange.

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 8:30 a.m. No.15319966   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0004

>>15319491 Child rapists will be sent to the ARCTIC under new Russian laws

 

Trump orders fleet of icebreakers and new bases in push for polar resources

Julian Borger

Donald Trump has ordered the construction of a fleet of icebreakers and bases to pursue US interests in the Arctic and Antarctic by the end of the decade in a signal that his administration is going to take a more aggressive approach to the contest with Russia and China for polar resources.

 

Trump issued a memorandum on “safeguarding US national interests in the Arctic and Antarctic regions” which calls on the administration to come up with a plan within 60 days that would include at least three heavy icebreakers to be built by 2029, and recommendations for locations to build two support bases in the US and two on foreign soil.

 

The memorandum appeared designed to expand and inject extra urgency into a longstanding US Coast Guard plan to build three heavy and three medium icebreakers. It suggests the US look into leasing arrangements while the new fleet is being built.

 

“This appears to be another rapid study to confirm or perhaps expand what the US needs,” said Heather Conley, senior vice-president for Europe, Eurasia and the Arctic at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. “Again, how to pay for it is another question that will need to be answered another day.”

• The US currently has just one heavy icebreaker, the ageing Polar Star, and one medium. Russia currently has 40 breakers in total, Finland has seven, and Canada and Sweden have six each.

• As the sea ice is melting, China is also laying claim to Arctic resources, although it does not have an Arctic coastline, by funding various infrastructure projects.

• Trump’s memorandum said the new icebreaker fleet would be used for “the full range of national and economic security missions (including the facilitation of resource exploration and exploitation and undersea cable laying and maintenance)”.

• The US study is to explore the potential for a nuclear-powered icebreaker, and “defensive armament adequate to defend against threats by near-peer competitors”.

• The US Coast Guard commander has said that they may need surface-to-air missiles to defend US territory against Russia and China.

• “It was also new that the US will seek two US domestic bases (one must be in Alaska, I assume) and international bases, presumably one in the south and one in the north,” Conley said. “Set against the backdrop of fears that the US is withdrawing forces from Europe and US funding requirements for basing support, this may not be too easy of a sell at the moment to our allies.”

• The aim of the polar security review is also meant to “include the ability to provide a persistent United States presence in the Antarctic region” adding that such presence would be “in accordance with the Antarctic Treaty System”, which requires that the region “be used for peaceful purposes only”.

• The intensifying rivalry over sea routes and mineral resources in the Arctic, itself a consequence of the climate emergency, has caused alarm over its environmental impact.

• “Even during a pandemic and nationwide protests against state violence, the Trump administration is still finding new ways to exploit the climate crisis. He is truly the worst president for the planet we’ve ever had,” Charlie Cray, a senior researcher for Greenpeace USA, said.

• “There are so many ways our tax dollars could be used to support Arctic communities. Helping out the oil industry and the military with a new fleet of icebreakers is definitely last on the list.”

Polar military experts are also sceptical over the urgency of the “icebreaker gap” with Russia.

“Icebreakers – even if armed – don’t really address some of the most commonly cited challenges that China and Russia might pose for the United States in the Arctic,” Paul Avey, assistant professor for political science at Virginia Tech university, argued. “This isn’t to say icebreakers can play no role in competition. But in narrow defence terms, I think that the best way to address China and Russia in the Arctic – and Antarctic – is to focus on issues in eastern Europe and the western Pacific.”

 

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/09/trump-icebreakers-bases-arctic-antarctic-polar

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 8:36 a.m. No.15320004   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0015 >>0430 >>0553

>>15319966

Will President Trump Disclose Antarctica Discovery to Start Economic Boom?

WRITTEN BY DR MICHAEL SALLA ON JANUARY 31, 2017. POSTED IN EXOARCHEOLOGY

 

According to Secret Space Program whistleblower, Corey Goode, preparations have been underway since 2002 to publicly announce the discovery of a flash frozen civilization in Antarctica. Goode’s startling claim has received support from internet data mining expert, Cliff High, who, in a January 2017 report, refers to an economic boom caused by an Antarctica announcement in the next year or so.

 

Goode and High’s information leads to the intriguing possibility that President Donald Trump will authorize a major announcement about an Antarctica discovery in order to rejuvenate America’s manufacturing industry.

 

On December 11, 2016, Goode revealed that he had learned about a major excavation underway in Antarctica of a flash frozen civilization that was technologically highly advanced, and involved extraterrestrial life. He said that since 2002, teams of scientists and archeologists have been excavating the ruins which are buried under two miles of ice.

 

Critically, in early January 2017, Goode says he was taken to Antarctica to see the ruins for himself by an Inner Earth civilization he calls the “Anshar”. Goode said that bodies and artifacts that are extraterrestrial in origin were being removed and replaced by terrestrial objects from warehouses secretly located elsewhere around the planet. The goal appears to be one of both sanitizing the area of any extraterrestrial evidence, while seeding artifacts that steer scientific analysis towards a desired agenda.

 

Circumstantial support for Goode’s claim of a major Antarctica discovery being excavated comes from a series of recent VIP visitors to Antarctica in 2016. The list includes then US Secretary of State John Kerry, Apollo Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, Russian Orthodox Church Patriarch Kirill, and Australia’s Governor General, Sir Peter Cosgrove.

 

Buzz Aldrin in Antarctica

 

There have also been visits to locations near Antarctica by former presidents Barack Obama who traveled to Bariloche, Argentina, and Bill Clinton who visited Christchurch, New Zealand.

 

In prior years, other VIP visitors included Prince Harry of Great Britain (2013) and King Juan Carlos of Spain (2004).

 

Goode’s startling claims are further supported by Cliff High’s January report examining recent internet trends. High describes his research method as the art of predictive linguistics which he explains as follows:

 

Predictive Linguistics is the process of using computer software to aggregate vast amounts of written text from the internet by categories delineated by emotional content of the words and using the result to make forecasts based on the emotional ‘tone’ changes within the larger population. A form of ‘collective sub-conscious expression’ is a good way to think of it. Predictive linguistics can be used to forecast trends at many different levels, from the detail of sales to individuals, all the way up to forecasts about emerging global population trends… more

 

https://exopolitics.org/will-president-trump-disclose-antarctica-discovery-to-start-economic-boom/

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 8:49 a.m. No.15320068   🗄️.is 🔗kun

January 6, 2022 will forever be known as the Day of Liars and Traitors==

 

https://twitter.com/JohnBasham/status/1479120256727539713?s=20

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 8:54 a.m. No.15320102   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0111 >>0113 >>0145 >>0255 >>0474

U.S. Armyweird???

How we send Tweets has come a long way over the years. Let us introduce you to the original twitter:The Carrier Pigeon!

#NationalBirdDay https://t.co/kqsvU2N5ob

https://twitter.com/USArmy/status/1478911010476072964?s=20

9:07 PM · Jan 5, 2022·Sprinklr

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 9:04 a.m. No.15320150   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0167 >>0233 >>0277

‘Reno 911!: The Hunt For QAnon’ Is A Work Of Art

BY: EMILY JASHINSKY

JANUARY 06, 2022

 

‘Reno 911!: The Hunt For QAnon’ extends the franchise’s long record of greatness, and that’s despite today’s crippling pressures of groupthink.

Author Emily Jashinsky profile

 

Nothing can separate the geniuses behind “Reno 911” from their own brilliance. From Bush to Biden, every iteration of the show is consistently hilarious. “Reno 911!: The Hunt For QAnon” extends the franchise’s long record of greatness, and that’s despite today’s crippling pressures of groupthink.

 

Few comedic offerings have mocked the absurdity of post-Obama politics with much success. “It’s Always Sunny In Philadelphia” is a holdover from the Bush era, which explains its ability to skewer right and left without forcing some vapid and ritualistic partisan endorsement. “Reno 911!” premiered two years earlier, all the way back in 2003, lampooning both sides of the culture wars just as they began congealing. The Q-centric film on Paramount+ retains that strength at a time when most comedy writers feel compelled to couch satire of the left with cheap signals of their progressivism.

 

“The Hunt for QAnon” also retains another key feature of the show from its Comedy Central days. Unlike most modern comedy, “Reno” (and “Sunny”) is perfectly comfortable as satire. It’s absurd, it’s offensive, it’s crass, and it’s not going to take you on an emotional journey.

 

“The Hunt For QAnon” relies on some easy tropes and swings lazily at some low-hanging fruit, but the grand Q conspiracy, for all its insanity, is objectively hilarious. It always should have been seen as such, instead of breathlessly treated as a threat to national security, which helped the web of theories metastasize into something bigger.

 

Writers Robert Ben Garant, Keri Kenney, and Thomas Lennon (who you know as Junior, Wiegel, and Dangle) let us relax and see the grifty Q movement for what it is—a collection of crazies, cynics, and disaffected people looking to make sense of a bizarre world.

 

Spoilers ahead.

 

The moment it’s clear they still get it comes when a Q cruise the officers are on turns out to be absolutely loaded with undercover law enforcement. Basically nobody in our political establishment or popular culture concedes this is a real part of the narrative. But, as always, “Reno 911!” is here to save the day.

 

Like “Reno 911!: Miami,” “The Hunt For QAnon” is a low-budget, low-logic romp, casting the show’s best guest stars in new roles, taking the characters out of their usual environment into something even stranger. It’s just fun. It’s not trying to be anything other than fun. Doing that and doing it well is a lost art.

 

Even Quibi couldn’t dull the spirit of “Reno 911!” When a new, bite-sized version of the show premiered on Jeffrey Katzenberg’s ill-fated streamer, it was like the team hadn’t missed a beat. The same is true of “The Hunt For QAnon.”…

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/06/reno-911-the-hunt-for-qanon-is-a-work-of-art/

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 9:07 a.m. No.15320164   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0192

The one good thing about today, is ALL of the traitors and subversives are PANICKING like its going out of style because of POTUS and his supporters

 

https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1479125608311500808?s=20

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 9:14 a.m. No.15320201   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0226 >>0430 >>0553

J6 Hysteria Is How Media And Other Democrats Are Avoiding Accountability For Their Rigging Of The 2020 Election

BY: MOLLIE HEMINGWAY

JANUARY 06, 2022

 

The 2020 presidential election was unlike any in American history.

 

Hundreds of laws and processes were changed in the months leading up to the election, sometimes legally and sometimes not, creating chaos, confusion, and uncertainty. Tech oligarch Mark Zuckerberg, one of the world’s wealthiest and most powerful men, spent $419 million — nearly as much as the federal government itself — to interfere in the government’s management of the election in key states.

 

Powerful tech oligarchs and corrupt propaganda press conspired to keep indisputably important news stories, such as allegations of corruption regarding the Biden family business, hidden from voters in the weeks prior to voting. Information operations were routinely manufactured about President Trump in the closing months of the campaign, including the false claim that Russians paid bounties for dead American soldiers and Trump didn’t care, and that Trump had called dead American soldiers losers. Both were disputed by dozens of on-the-record sources.

 

Effective conservative voices were censored by the social media arms of the Democrat Party. And all this was done after the establishment spent years running an unprecedented “Resistance” that falsely claimed Trump was a traitor who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election.

 

It’s not surprising that polls show most Republicans are deeply concerned about the integrity of such an election. If anything, it’s surprising that all of them aren’t screaming from the rooftops about it. But it is interesting and telling how little the media and other Democrats are willing to talk about efforts to rig the election.

 

With the exception of a single Time Magazine article admitting there was a “conspiracy” by a “a well-funded cabal of powerful people” who worked to “change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information,” to create a “revolution in how people vote,” corporate media have largely kept silent about or downplayed how the establishment secured its victory for their man Joe Biden.

 

Time’s article didn’t come out until February 4, 2021, but in the months prior to its publication, Republicans grew increasingly concerned that the rigging it described had, in fact, happened.

 

Their desire for free and fair elections they could trust, elections that “well-funded cabals of powerful people” weren’t able to rig, resulted in mass protests following the November election. The fact that the election was exceedingly close didn’t help matters.

 

Media and other left-wing pollsters had put out preposterous suppression polls to help Biden get over the finish line. For example, the Washington Post’s final poll claimed Biden would win the swing state of Wisconsin by 17 points, indicating a nationwide blowout of historic proportions. (He won it by seven-tenths of a percent.) The actual outcome took weeks to calculate and came down to just 43,000 votes across three states, even closer than Trump’s close victory over Hillary Clinton in 2016.

 

The media and other Democrats have used the January 6 riot at the Capitol as a way to ignore legitimate concerns about what they did to the election system, and as a way to continue the assault on election security.

 

As part of their political operation, they have used a propaganda technique of redefining efforts to secure the integrity of elections as attacks on democracy.

 

The 2020 campaign to destroy election security by flooding the system with tens of millions of mail-in ballots was run by Marc Elias, a braggadocious Democrat attorney and former general counsel for Hillary Clinton who also ran the Russia collusion hoax that seriously damaged the country. In fact, one of his partners in the scheme was recently indicted by prosecutor John Durham for lying about his role in the hoax. Elias and his “well-funded cabal of powerful people” are hoping to make permanent or even expand the weakening of election security.

 

The propaganda press have also downplayed Zuckerberg’s staggering $419 million expenditure, or falsely presented it as non-partisan help to voters. Independent researchers have shown that the funding dollars overwhelmingly poured into Democrat counties, and particularly such counties in swing states…..more

 

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/06/j6-hysteria-is-how-media-and-other-democrats-are-avoiding-accountability-for-their-rigging-of-the-2020-election/

Anonymous ID: f130b1 Jan. 6, 2022, 9:26 a.m. No.15320289   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0299

==‘Fanfare for the First Lady’

Trappings.==

T. Becket Adams

 

I just realized FJB could be Fuck Jill Biden also

Jill Biden apparently has her own walk-up music now.

 

The Marine Corps band was instructed last fall to come up with an entrance theme for the first lady, according to a knowledgeable source. The band now has in its repertoire an original composition titled “Fanfare for the First Lady.” The song, the source said, is essentially Jill Biden's personal “Hail to the Chief,” in that it is to be performed and repeated at official White House functions, from her first appearance until she is ready to speak.

 

“Fanfare for the First Lady” has created both amusement and confusion within the band, with some remarking that in the many years they’ve played in the group, this is the first time they’ve had to provide the first lady with an exclusive entrance theme.

 

Subscribe

Someone in the White House apparently "had the bright idea, 'Oh, tell the band that we want music for Jill,'" a source said. “The band had to provide music.”

 

The band was “rushed” to provide the entrance song for the first lady, the source said, adding the Marine Corps band submitted a few options for the White House’s consideration. The first lady's handlers settled eventually on the original piece “Fanfare to the First Lady.”

 

Michael LaRosa, Jill Biden's press secretary, says the entire story is bunkum.

 

“The first lady does not have a song anybody has written for her specifically. She has no ‘Hail to the Chief’ song. She has no song,” he told me. “She never asked anyone to create a song.”

 

“The White House asked nobody, not one person, to compose an exclusive entry song, or any song, for the first lady,” LaRosa added. “None of that is accurate.”

 

In fact, he said, “Fanfare for the First Lady” was the band’s idea. He said the band approached the White House with a proposal for new music. “Fanfare for the First Lady" wasn’t even initially written for Jill Biden, he continued, adding it's simply a finalized version of a piece of music that was already nearly completed when the band first broached the topic with the White House.

 

“We didn’t ask for it,” LaRosa said. “They came and presented us the option. We had no idea it would even be used again.”

 

Share

 

The Marine Corps band has made a recording of “Fanfare for the First Lady” to be played in its absence.

 

Though it’s not unusual for the group's arrangers to be asked to compose music at a moment’s notice, a source told me, it is unusual for the first lady to have her own entrance theme. The cherry on top giving the first lady the “Hail to the Chief” treatment, the source said, is this: “The music is just awful."

 

“The song is terrible,” the source said, adding it's ironic a "completely bogus premise" should result in such an “awful” final product.

 

The Marine Corps band, which did not respond to my request for comment, has performed “Fanfare for the First Lady” at least twice already, including in October of last year for a Teacher of the Year event held at the White House:

 

https://tbecketadams.substack.com/p/fanfare-for-the-first-lady?r=23dzz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email