Anonymous ID: d38d54 Jan. 6, 2022, 6:47 p.m. No.15323875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3883 >>3899

>>15323741

If the NG had been deployed the plan would have been foiled. Pelosi and Bowser had to refuse the President's help. This had to look like it was a coordinated an planned terrorist attack incited by President Trump and carried out by MAGA supporters. Ocham's Razor is the applicable principle here. There is no other truthful explanation.

Anonymous ID: d38d54 Jan. 6, 2022, 7:01 p.m. No.15323964   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4219 >>4332 >>4341 >>4346 >>4367

>>15323874

I think Tucker did a good job holding Cruz's feet to the fire. Unfortunately, I don't buy Cruz's explanation. Will have to do some digging on his explanation.

 

Using the words "terrorist attack" Cruz had to know that this description of what happened aids and abets and plays right into the democrat propagandist narrative. Ted Cruz is an accomplished oratator, accomplished attorney who has argued successfully many times before SCOTUS. This man is not stupid nor is he careless with his words. Words have meaning and words carry intent. Cruz's intent? This is the puzzling aspect of his statement.