Anonymous ID: bac646 Jan. 9, 2022, 6:40 p.m. No.15341023   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1033 >>1037 >>1040 >>1042

You Know the Global Elites are Triggered When the Propaganda Institutions Collaborate to Refute “Mass Formation Psychosis”

 

Well, butter my buns and call me a biscuit… if this ain’t the biggest revealing tell in years.

 

Apparently Big Tech and big propaganda media, Reuters and the Associated Press, have joined together to refute the concept of “Mass Formation Psychosis”, and pushed their collective narrative into the narrative engineering system:

 

The Associated Press – SEE HERE and Reuters – SEE HERE, quickly rush to the “fact check” typeset to stop people from recognizing what is most likely the cause of their own psychosis. In a world where things are no longer shocking, this is, well, a little shocking, in a weird and seemingly Orwellian kind of way.

 

Yes Alice, the same “experts” and media who are credibly accused of creating/enabling the mass formation psychosis would like to assure us that no such reality exists. This is almost too funny.

 

(AP) – […] “The concept has no academic credibility,” Stephen Reicher, a social psychology professor at the University of St Andrews in the U.K., wrote in an email to The Associated Press. The term also does not appear in the American Psychological Association’s Dictionary of Psychology.

 

“Psychosis” is a term that refers to conditions that involve some disconnect from reality. According to a National Institutes of Health estimate, about 3% of people experience some form of psychosis at some time in their lives.

 

[…] The description of “mass formation psychosis” offered by Malone resembles discredited concepts, such as “mob mentality” and “group mind,” according to John Drury, a social psychologist at the University of Sussex in the U.K. who studies collective behavior. The ideas suggest that “when people form part of a psychological crowd they lose their identities and their self-control; they become suggestible, and primitive instinctive impulses predominate,” he said in an email.

 

That notion has been discredited by decades of research on crowd behavior, Drury said. “No respectable psychologist agrees with these ideas now,” he said.

 

Multiple experts told the AP that while there is evidence that groups can shape or influence one’s behaviors — and that people can and do believe falsehoods that are put forward by the leader of a group — those concepts do not involve the masses experiencing “psychosis” or “hypnosis.” (read more)

 

Reuters offers this simultaneous rebuttal:

 

(Reuters) – “Mass formation psychosis” is not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology, nor is there evidence of any such phenomenon occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple experts in crowd psychology have told Reuters.

 

[…] There is no evidence to suggest a “mass formation psychosis” has occurred during the pandemic, experts told Reuters. The term itself is not recognised among academics, and modern research into crowd psychology has shown that crowds do not behave in mindless or non-individualistic ways. (more)

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/01/08/you-know-the-entire-global-system-of-fraud-is-triggered-when-the-propaganda-institutions-collaborate-to-refute-mass-formation-psychosis/

Anonymous ID: bac646 Jan. 9, 2022, 6:41 p.m. No.15341030   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Rep. Jim Jordan Tells Jan. 6 Panel to Pound Sound, Rejects Legitimacy of Investigation

 

Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) told the January 6 panel to pound sand after they asked him to provide information about his communications with Trump about the Jan. 6 Capitol protest.

 

Rep. Jordan formally responded to the January 6 panel in a letter to the committee’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson.

 

“This request is far outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry, violates core Constitutional principles, and would serve to further erode legislative norms,” Jordan wrote to Thompson.

 

“As you well know, I have no relevant information that would assist the Select Committee in advancing any legitimate legislative purpose,” he added.

 

“We understand that you had at least one and possibly multiple communications with President Trump on January 6th. We would like to discuss each such communication with you in detail,” Thompson wrote

 

Mr. Jordan argued that he speaks to President Trump all the time so it is not unusual that he spoke to Trump on January 6.

 

Jordan is correct. The January 6 panel is totally illegitimate.

 

One problem for the panel is that there is no ranking member.

 

Liz Cheney, the vice chairwoman of the panel, falsely claimed she was the ranking member of the J-6 committee this week.

 

“Liz Cheney just falsely claimed she is the ranking member — the top representative of the GOP caucus — on the J6 committee. In fact, she was hand-selected by Nancy Pelosi and Is NOT the ranking member. Huge, huge legal implications associated with this lie.” Mollie Hemmingway from the Federalist said.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/rep-jim-jordan-tells-jan-6-panel-pound-sound-rejects-legitimacy-investigation/

Anonymous ID: bac646 Jan. 9, 2022, 6:44 p.m. No.15341053   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Iran sanctions 51 Americans, White House responds threatening 'severe consequences'

 

Sullivan responded: "Make no mistake: the United States of America will protect and defend its citizens."

 

 

Iran on Saturday sanctioned 51 U.S. officials in response to the assassination of General Qassim Soleimani, and the following day, White House national security advisor Jake Sullivan warned of "severe consequences" if Iran attacks any American.

 

The most recently announced sanctions come shortly after the anniversary of the Jan. 3, 2020, U.S. drone strike on Soleimani in Baghdad. Similar sanctions were announced last year shortly after the attack's one-year anniversary.

 

The additional sanctions named U.S. leaders such as head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley and Central Command head Gen. Kenneth McKenzie as well as Trump officials including former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley and former chief of staff Mick Mulvaney (spelled incorrectly on the Iranian document as "John Micheal mulvaney").

 

The Iranian sanctions imposed one year ago signaled out former President Donald Trump, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former national security adviser John Bolton and seven others. The Islamic Republic accused the ten of "terrorist actions" by assassinating Soleimani, former head of Iran's elite Quds force who the country describes as a "martyr."

 

Sullivan responded: "Make no mistake: the United States of America will protect and defend its citizens."

 

Although many of those sanctioned are from the prior administration, Sullivan said: "As Americans, we have our disagreements on politics. We have our disagreements on Iran policy. But we are united in our resolve against threats and provocations. We are united in the defense of our people."

 

"We will work with our allies and partners to deter and respond to any attacks carried out by Iran," Sullivan concluded. "Should Iran attack any of our nationals, including any of the 51 people named yesterday, it will face severe consequences."

 

The sanctions allow authorities to confiscate assets a named person owns in Iran. The move is largely symbolic, Axios reports, as those named are not believed to own assets in the Islamic Republic.

 

Tensions in the Middle East have risen due to the anniversary of the general's death. Last week, Syrian and Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops were attacked, but no one was killed.

 

https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/iran-sanctions-51-americans-white-house-responds-threatening-severe-consequences

Anonymous ID: bac646 Jan. 9, 2022, 7:45 p.m. No.15341423   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Massive 145-Country Study Shows Sharp INCREASE of Transmission and DEATH After Introduction of COVID Vaccines

 

Instead of bringing an end to this pandemic as promised, the widespread rollout of the experimental vaccines has actually caused a sharp increase in Covid-19 cases and deaths across the world, according to a recently published preprint study that looked at data from the 145 of the most vaccinated countries in the world.

 

The 99-page study titled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries” found that in the US specifically, the jab has caused a whopping 38% more Covid cases per million – and an even more astonishing 31% increase in deaths per million.

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356248984_Worldwide_Bayesian_Causal_Impact_Analysis_of_Vaccine_Administration_on_Deaths_and_Cases_Associated_with_COVID-19_A_BigData_Analysis_of_145_Countries

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-145-country-study-shows-sharp-increase-transmission-death-introduction-covid-vaccines/