From past Bread.

>>1533909 (You)

>>1533954 (You)

>>1533955

>>1533980

>>1534059

>>1534059

No it's not shopped.

The image was photographed off the newspaper.

Guy claiming "It's shopped" is a shill

[typical. And it won't be the first time these fucking liars tried to mess with me]

It's from Friday

, March 17

Saint Patrick's Day 2017

Can you see where it says "Friday" in the caption?

My only question is, If it's Irish why do they call it "Bagpipes?" and why does google say "Bagpipes" and "Kilts" are Scot?

Also, I studied the pipes at the time, when I first took the image..What I found at the time was: If you see could the actual pipes you could say if they were Irish style or Scot style. However, you can't see them in this image. The backs are turned and the pipes are obscured.

Person saying, "I'm Scot and I know." Or "I'm Irish and I know" doesn't prove it to me one way or the other.

I felt at the time many people, Americans, assumed they were Irish without actually knowing it?

Obviously it's meant to suggest Scot, because it's Kilts and Bagpipes. The caption says "Bagpipes"

I'm not married to either thought. But I'm less than settled in my own mind, as to which it is. I studied it at the time and was told "They are Irish" but I wasn't convinced.

Someone has to show it to me, not just make a claim.

>>1534388

Maybe the NYTimes mismarked it and it's Uilleann pipes?

>>1534059

There was no article title.

It was just the image on the front page. No article.

If you study "New York Times" you will find they sometimes do that. An image with a caption; No article.

Think: What would the "article" be anyway? "St. Patricks Day Parade" That's the whole "story."

Prove it's shopped. Honestly, the folks are so illiterate around here and in general as to actual shopped photos, that the fact some ignorant person claims this is shopped just proves they are a shill. Or, when the truth hits them can't see it since they are so used to believing shopped photos are real- they can't tell a real photo. It's pathetic.

And this whole "Where are the sources?" Ya'll are gonna end up like VOAT. Your whole reputation is built on "Q" .

There's a collection of NYTimes covers, I'm sure, online if you felt the need to prove it to yourselves.

I already did the work. And I'm not going to pay them to go into their archive just to get on your fucking notables. Get over yourselves. Most of the notables are lame anyway.

>>1534505 (addendum)

I was able to prove where they were walking after some study. Right near Trump Tower on their way to 666 5th.