>You're describing it as being what you claim it is
My only claim is that I don't believe in your claim about there being a God.
>that in the entire universe, that everything that exists, it is what you describe which makes God an impossibility.
I never said God was an impossibility. I said I don't believe there is a God.
>You're just so used to framing the thought in a way that absolves yourself of any burden of proof.
I have no burden of proof when I'm not the one making a claim. I don't claim God doesn't exist. I claim he's not proven to exist and that I don't believe he exists.
He might - I just don't think so…