>>15349863 pb

>So I prove to myself that God exists by asking him if he exists?

>You don't see the circular logic here?

>And if I actually get an answer, why would I trust it to be God and not a Demon or some interdimensional thing or some completely 3rd thing?

You are absolutely brilliant!! and the answers you are getting are mostly nonsense. Mostly; but God will answer you.

Your first question is circular reasoning only if God answers you in only subjective ways.

If you want to know if I exist, ask me, we'll work it out so that you can know.

God said that knowledge of him comes before belief/trust. Isa 43:10 Ye [are] my witnesses, saith the LORD, and my servant whom I have chosen: that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I [am] he: before me there was no God formed, neither shall there be after me.

The church doesn't teach it because from the beginning of the Greek church, they did not want to know. Acts 15:10ff

And now they have forgotten HOW to know, and push 'belief' first since your beliefs are so much easier manipulated than knowledge.

The tools for interpreting the scriptures that they lost are the tools to read the sensus plenior, and restored notarikon.

Notarikon reveals a verifiable and reproducible proof of God, and that his word is his word. It reveals Christ in all of the Old Testament scriptures in great detail such that every dot and stroke of every letter participates in it; all without free-for-all allegory.

Cults are formed by using the hermeneutic of the Catholic and Protestant churches. They use Greek debate, logic and rhetorical invention to persuade; but those tools cannot produce truth, which is why there are so many divisions.