Tyb
Baker checking in
o7
Brian Cates - Political Columnist ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Forwarded from
⚡ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽
(S P)
Ivermectin 'Works Throughout All Phases' Of COVID According To Leaked Military Documents | ZeroHedge
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/hidden-military-documents-reveal-nih-intent-create-sars-cov-2-using-gain-function-research
ZeroHedge
Ivermectin 'Works Throughout All Phases' Of COVID According To Leaked Military Documents
"it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response."
https://t.me/s/drawandstrikechannel
Project Veritas Obtains Hidden Military Documents Showing NIH Intent to Create SARS-CoV-2, Using Gain of Function Research
January 10, 2022 | Sundance | 529 Comments
Project Veritas has obtained military documents hidden on a classified system [HERE – and HERE – and HERE] showing how EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses.
The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violated the gain of function research moratorium. However, according to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top-secret shared drive.
DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.
Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
The report states that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S. (read more)
Here’s my answer to the question posed by James O’Keefe.
In the original pdf guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was an important footnote [LINK]:
[FN¹ SOURCE – U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses – pdf, page 2 – October 17, 2014]
Timeline:
♦ October 17, 2014 – U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.” [LINK]
♦ 2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began]. [LINK]
♦ May 2016 – [An Election Year] – “after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB’s central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance Potential Pandemic Pathogen (PPP) have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded.” Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice Oval Office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] – The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons. “Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).“ [LINK]
Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China. The 2014 ban was a funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.
What was reauthorized in 2017, just before President Trump took office, was the need to use “national security” as an excuse to continue the research. It also appears funding of SARS as a biological weapon inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.
REFERENCES SO FAR: – 2017 – Policy Guidelines from Obama Administration – 2014 – pdf link of Research Funding Pause – National Science Advisory Board (Wiki) – Pentagon Funding for SARS research 2013 through 2020.
If you accept that the Pentagon would never spend to develop a biological weapon in China (Wuhan Lab) unless they already had developed that weapon on their own (North Carolina Lab), then the question about the release of that weapon starts to take shape.
Remember, the State Department was looking into the origin until Joe Biden shut them down and redirected the goal to the Intelligence Community. In essence, Biden handed the mission to the Fourth Branch of Government. Not surprisingly, after a few months the IC said their results were “inconclusive.”
♦ [Excerpt] – […] In one State Department meeting, officials seeking to demand transparency from the Chinese government say they were explicitly told by colleagues not to explore the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s gain-of-function research, because it would bring unwelcome attention to U.S. government funding of it.
In an internal memo obtained by Vanity Fair, Thomas DiNanno, former acting assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance, wrote that staff from two bureaus, his own and the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, “warned” leaders within his bureau “not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19” because it would “‘open a can of worms’ if it continued.”
[…] In late March, former Centers for Disease Control director Robert Redfield received death threats from fellow scientists after telling CNN that he believed COVID-19 had originated in a lab. “I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis,” Redfield told Vanity Fair. “I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.” (read more)
♦ Washington (CNN) – “President Joe Biden’s team shut down a closely-held State Department effort launched late in the Trump administration to prove the coronavirus originated in a Chinese lab over concerns about the quality of its work, according to three sources familiar with the decision.
The existence of the State Department inquiry and its termination this spring by the Biden administration — neither of which has been previously reported — comes to light amid renewed interest in whether the virus could have leaked out of a Wuhan lab with links to the Chinese military. The Biden administration is also facing scrutiny of its own efforts to determine if the Chinese government was responsible for the virus.
♦ “On Wednesday, Biden issued a statement that he has directed the US intelligence community to redouble its efforts in investigating the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic and report back to him in 90 days.” (LINK)
♦ [WASHINGTON DC] – The intelligence community failed to conclusively identify the origin of the coronavirus following a 90-day investigation ordered by President Biden, but experts are divided on why.
A report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) found that officials were unable to rule whether the virus escaped from a lab or spread to humans through an infected animal. But the ultimate conclusion reached by the $85 billion-a-year community was that it would be unable to pinpoint the origin of the virus if China didn’t fully cooperate. (LINK)
If you have followed how the U.S. Intelligence Community operates, you can see a pretty clear picture emerge of a strong likelihood surrounding what took place.
The U.S. Defense Dept developed SARS-CoV-2 in North Carolina. The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) wanted to use it. The Pentagon restarts funding for development of SARS-CoV-2 in partnership with Wuhan, China – setting up the cover story. The 4th Branch (Intelligence Community) then uses the virus by releasing it in/around Wuhan. Everything after that is simply part of the 4th Branch covering their tracks. Wuhan, China becomes the patsy.
The IC release of COVID-19 would have two transparent motives for the 4th Branch: (1) Get rid of Trump via mail-in ballots, and intelligence assistance toward the 2020 election result; and (2) Expand their influence and control operations as the most powerful force in U.S. government.
One of the central players, who likely knows the details behind who exactly executed the release, is former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has been blaming the Chinese almost exclusively. [Methinks he doth protest too much.] Pompeo is the ultimate weapon of the deep swamp.
Former DNI John Ratcliffe is also a staunch figure pointing at Wuhan, China. Keep in mind DNI Ratcliffe was the recipient of the 4th Branch Intelligence Community products that pointed to Wuhan, China, though Ratcliffe had no involvement.
If it sounds like this thesis is too far ‘out there‘, then you may not fully understand how the Fourth Branch of Government operates…..
…… Also, there were trillions at stake. He could not be allowed to win.
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/01/10/project-veritas-obtains-hidden-military-documents-showing-nih-intent-to-create-sars-cov-2-using-gain-of-function-research/
Jenny McCarthy Was Always Right
Big Government & Big Pharma have known about the link between catastrophic mercury/aluminum levels in child vaccines & autism since 2005. And they covered it up.
Unnerved at the growing popularity of author Robert Kennedy Jr.’s explosive book “The Real Anthony Fauci”, last week CNN anchor Jake Tapper took to his Twitter account to disparage the author as a ‘liar’ and a ‘conspiracy theorist’ peddling snake oil to the public while defaming his good friend, who is the head of the federal government’s National Institute of Allergies & Infectious Diseases [NIAID] and who is also Tapper’s frequent guest on his program, ‘The Lead’.
Robert Kennedy Jr. then offered to debate Tapper publicly over his accusations. Tapper snidely turned him down, and continued attacking Kennedy Jr. on his Twitter:
After such a sustained high-profile personal attack by one of the nation’s leading Fake News propagandists, it wasn’t long before the founder of Children’s Health Defense fired back at Tapper with some accusations of his own. And unlike Tapper, Kennedy Jr. provided sourcing and documentation for his claims.
Kennedy reveals that back in 2005, the FDA and the CDC finally got around to doing the basic ‘9th grade algebra’ they should have done before 1989, when they’d added a plethora of new vaccines to the vaccination schedule for the nation’s public school children.
I will quote briefly from Kennedy’s article, and I encourage you to click over and read the entire amazing thing.
In 1999, in response to exploding epidemics of autism and other neurological disorders, CDC decided to study its vast Vaccine Safety Datalink — the medical and vaccination record of millions of Americans, archived by the top HMOs — to learn whether the dramatic escalation of the vaccine schedule, beginning in 1989, was a culprit. CDC’s in-house epidemiologist, Thomas Verstraeten, led the effort.
Verstraeten’s initial data run suggested that mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines — administered during the first month of life — were associated with a wide range of neurological injuries, including a dramatic 1,135% rise in autism risks among vaccinated children.
Verstraeten’s findings propelled CDC into DEFCON 1. The agency’s top vaccine officials summoned 52 pharmaceutical industry leaders, the foremost vaccinologists from academia and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and public health regulators from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency to a secret two-day meeting at the remote Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia, to strategize about how to hide these awful revelations from the public.
Apparently, nobody had checked to see what the new levels of mercury & aluminum would be on this new vaccination schedule introduced in 1989. At least, this is the claim that’s made. Out of thousands of health professionals supposedly doing the serious work of guarding the public health, nobody took the time to do the necessary and vital calculations before all these new vaccines were approved and rolled out the door. And all that money rolled into Big Pharma’s pockets.
15 years she’s been waiting to be vindicated. Her day has arrived.
https://briancates.substack.com/p/jenny-mccarthy-was-always-right
Brian Cates - Political Columnist ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Forwarded from
Disclose.tv
JUST IN -GOP Oversight Committee releases never before seen emails of NIAID Director Dr. Fauci "showing he may have concealed information about #COVID19 originating from the Wuhan lab & intentionally downplayed the lab leak theory."
https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Letter-Re.-Feb-1-Emails-011122.pdf
https://t.me/s/drawandstrikechannel
Oversight Committee Republicans @GOPoversight We've released never before seen emails showing Dr. Fauci may have concealed information about #COVID19 originating from the Wuhan lab & intentionally downplayed the lab leak theory.
@RepJamesComer & @Jim_Jordan want Fauci under oath. Time for answers. 1/2
https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/status/1480909671082901504
Voting Laws Roundup: December 2021
This year’s tidal wave of restrictive voting legislation will continue in 2022.
Published: December 21, 2021
In 2021, the state legislative push to restrict access to voting was not only aggressive — it was also successful.
Between January 1 and December 7, at least 19 states passed 34 laws restricting access to voting. More than 440 bills with provisions that restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states in the 2021 legislative sessions. These numbers are extraordinary: state legislatures enacted far more restrictive voting laws in 2021 than in any year since the Brennan Center began tracking voting legislation in 2011. More than a third of all restrictive voting laws enacted since then were passed this year. And in a new trend this year, legislators introduced bills to allow partisan actors
footnote1_w5l579z
1 to interfere with election processes or even reject election results entirely.
Unfortunately, the momentum around this legislation continues. So far, at least 13 bills restricting access to voting have been pre-filed
footnote2_4w5a7xy
2 for the 2022 legislative session in four states. In addition, at least 88 restrictive voting bills in nine states will carry over from 2021. These early indicators — coupled with the ongoing mobilization around the Big Lie (the same false rhetoric about voter fraud that drove this year’s unprecedented wave of vote suppression bills) — suggest that efforts to restrict and undermine the vote will continue to be a serious threat in 2022.
There are solutions to this alarming and unprecedented attack on our democracy. Congress has the power to take bold action now to protect American voters from the kinds of restrictions enacted this year and the looming threats to voters and elections that may be imposed in 2022 and beyond. Two bills that would head off many of the assaults on free and fair elections have passed the House of Representatives and are awaiting Senate votes.
The Freedom to Vote Act is a broad package of voting, redistricting, election security, and campaign finance reforms that would ensure minimum national standards for voting access for every American. It would also prevent partisans from sabotaging election results. The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would prevent discriminatory practices and rules in voting from being implemented in states and localities where discrimination is persistent and pervasive, protecting access to the vote for all eligible voters, regardless of race, color, or membership in language minority groups. And it would restore voters’ ability to challenge discriminatory laws nationwide.
Looking Ahead to 2022
In 2022, the Brennan Center expects continued efforts to restrict access to voting and to enable partisans to sabotage elections. The risk is evident in:
States where restrictive bills are carrying over into 2022
footnote3_g9fiy4x
3
States where legislators have already pre-filed restrictive voting bills for the 2022 legislative sessions
footnote4_y9zr4qi
4
States where legislatures or partisan actors are working to circumvent governors’ vetoes
footnote5_xtl9fi7
5
States where governors have vetoed restrictive bills this year, or where 2022 gubernatorial elections could lead to the election of governors who support voting restrictions
footnote6_on9yxk7
6
States that have been the site of partisan election reviews
footnote7_sqj45yu
7
1. Carryover Bills
At least 88 restrictive bills in nine states will carry over into the 2022 legislative sessions.
footnote8_4e708sp
8 The number of restrictive carryover bills, along with 13 restrictive pre-filed bills (discussed below), is greater than the number of restrictive bills considered by state legislatures in most years in the past decade.
These carryover bills were introduced during the 2021 state legislative sessions but did not reach final resolution this year. Twenty-five states that have legislative sessions scheduled in 2022 allow for carryover bills. Of the nine states that have restrictive carryover bills, two enacted restrictive voting laws this year (KS, NY); three passed restrictive voting bills that were vetoed by the governor (MI, PA, WI); and three have conducted or have ongoing partisan reviews of the 2020 election (MI, PA, WI).
The majority (57) of the carryover bills would continue this year’s trend of restricting access to mail voting. Recurring restrictions in these bills include shortening the window for applying for a mail-in ballot (e.g., PA H.B. 1706); shortening the deadline for delivering mail ballots (e.g., KS S.B. 307); prohibiting sending out unsolicited mail ballot applications (e.g., MI H.B. 5268); and restricting voters’ ability to receive assistance with returning a mail ballot (e.g., OH H.B. 387).
Seven bills would expand opportunities for voter purges.
footnote9_lum26yh
9 Five bills propose new criminal penalties for election officials who mail out unsolicited mail ballots or for individuals who assist voters with returning mail ballots, including those assisting voters who have disabilities.
footnote10_o91nmom
10 Twenty-three bills would establish or expand voter identification requirements for either in-person or mail voting, and three would require proof of citizenship to register to vote.
footnote11_46chnui
11
2. Pre-Filed Bills
A number of states allow lawmakers to “pre-file” bills ahead of the next legislative session. The pre-filed bills are not yet moving, but they are typically among state lawmakers’ top priorities for the 2022 legislative session.
As of December 7, at least 74 bills addressing voting access and elections have been pre-filed for the 2022 session in 11 of the 22 states that allow bills to be pre-filed so far.
Of the pre-filed bills, at least 13 bills in four states would make it harder for voters to cast a ballot.
footnote12_hge77se
12
Of the restrictive pre-filed bills, at least seven would limit access to mail voting, including shortening the time period in which a mail ballot may be requested, eliminating Covid-19 as an excuse for voting by mail, and expanding the grounds on which an absentee ballot can be rejected.
footnote13_du92bcj
13 Five pre-filed Missouri bills contain provisions that would impose a stricter voter ID requirement for in-person and mail ballots.
footnote14_o3hftmx
14
Additionally, legislators in at least five states have pre-filed seven bills for 2022
footnote15_8ew8yzx
15 to initiate or allow illegitimate partisan reviews of election results.
3. Circumventing Governor Vetoes and 2022 Gubernatorial Races
In at least two states (MI and PA), state legislators or other actors have taken steps to enact restrictive legislation through constitutional amendment (PA) or ballot initiative (MI). As discussed below, both methods would disempower the states’ governors and the Michigan ballot initiative would preclude the majority of the state’s own voters from weighing in on the proposal.
In addition, the winners of the 2022 gubernatorial races could also impact legislatures’ ability to enact restrictive voting legislation. Voters in 36 states will be electing a governor in 2022. Three states — Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin — have state legislatures that passed restrictive voting legislation in 2021 that was vetoed by the governor and gubernatorial elections in 2022. While governors who support voting access have held the line against restrictive voting bills this year, those measures will be more easily enacted in the event of the election of governors who support restrictive voting policies.
4. Partisan Election Reviews
A disturbing legislative trend from 2021 is the launching of illegitimate partisan reviews of election results in a number of key states. Specifically, partisan state legislators have empowered other partisan actors who are not part of the election administration process to access and review ballots and other materials from the 2020 elections. As the Brennan Center has documented elsewhere, these reviews have typically been designed to set the stage for future efforts to suppress votes and subvert election outcomes. In 2021, questionable and politically motivated reviews of the 2020 election results occurred or are ongoing in six states (AZ, GA, MI, PA, TX, and WI).
Now, legislators in five states (FL, MO, NH, SC, and TN) have pre-filed seven bills for 2022
footnote16_00qa2xp
16 to initiate or allow similar partisan reviews of election results. Five of these bills would initiate reviews of the 2020 election, and two of them would set up processes for partisan reviews of future elections.
Key States to Watch
Below are key states to monitor in 2022. These states have already shown some of the warning signs discussed above.
Arizona legislatures passed three restrictive voting bills this year,
footnote17_gxmrczc
17 and they have pre-filed at least one bill that would restrict voting access by imposing stricter identification requirements.
footnote18_de3wx4g
18 Additionally, state legislators introduced three bills in 2021 that would have directly empowered partisan officials to reject or overturn election results.
footnote19_b1hgb1s
19 The state also conducted an infamous partisan election review this year, when it contracted a third party to audit Maricopa County’s 2020 election results. Despite no evidence of fraud, the review has drummed up false rhetoric around voter fraud and galvanized public officials to push for restrictive voting legislation.
Georgia passed S.B. 202, a restrictive omnibus law that criminalizes passing out water to voters waiting in line. The law also politicizes the state’s board of elections and grants the board new powers to remove professional election officials and seize control of election administration in specific jurisdictions, which could lead to partisan influence in the election certification process. Moreover, partisan actors sought to review the election results in Fulton County because of false allegations of fraud, despite the fact that state election officials conducted a statutory audit that led to a full hand count along with two machine counts.
Georgia has high-profile elections for secretary of state and governor in 2022. One candidate for secretary of state has repeated false fraud claims and voted not to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election, while two candidates for governor have explicitly stated that they would not have certified the results of the 2020 election had they been in office at the time.
Michigan’s legislature passed — but the governor vetoed — three restrictive voting bills;
footnote20_5e6ioe9
20 15 restrictive bills are carrying over into the 2022 legislative session; and the state has a gubernatorial race next year.
Additionally, partisan actors have turned to a ballot initiative to pass restrictive measures to bypass both the governor and the people. Due to a quirk of the Michigan Constitution, if a ballot initiative garners the required number of signatures of support (340,047), the legislature gets a chance to pass it in its own right. This means the majority of Michigan voters never get an opportunity to vote on the initiative, and the governor has no power to veto such an initiative if the legislature passes it.
Anti-voting activists are currently organizing a restrictive ballot initiative that would, among other things, eliminate the ability for voters who lack a voter identification to cast a regular ballot; require voters to put the last four digits of their Social Security number on their voter registration; require voters to provide their driver’s license number, state ID card number, or the last four digits of their Social Security number on absentee ballot applications; and prohibit either the secretary of state or local election officials from affirmatively sending absentee ballot application forms to voters. The number of signatures required to give the green light for the Michigan Legislature to roll back the voting rights of millions of Michiganders — unchecked by the governor or voters — is fewer than the actual number of votes separating the two major candidates in the state’s last gubernatorial election.
In one Michigan county, a partisan group was given access to voting machines to review the 2020 election results, despite the fact that Michigan has a robust, accurate risk-limiting audit system already in place. And lawmakers introduced a bill that would have allowed a member of a county board of canvassers to rescind their vote to certify the results of an election — which is exactly what President Trump sought in Wayne County after the 2020 election.
footnote21_3u3jfiy
21
Pennsylvania’s' legislature passed one wide-ranging restrictive bill this year, which the governor vetoed.
footnote22_h18y5i1
22 Thirty restrictive bills are carrying over into the 2022 legislative session. The state also has a gubernatorial race next year. Four of the restrictive carryover bills are constitutional amendment proposals that would enable state legislators to get restrictive voting laws on the books without the governor’s review.
footnote23_yu9jqup
23 (These proposals would need majority approval by the 2021-2022 and 2022-2023 state legislatures, and then majority approval from voters).
Further, officials in one rural Pennsylvania county agreed to a questionable partisan review of their 2020 election results by a private security firm with no previous experience auditing elections and funded by Sidney Powell, a Trump-affiliated attorney who pursued unsuccessful post-election lawsuits based on debunked conspiracy theories. A Pennsylvania state senator who was present at Capitol Hill during the January 6 insurrection has since used the “results” of this questionable review to push for further restrictive voting legislation.
Texas passed S.B. 1 this year, one of the harshest restrictive voting bills in the country. The law makes it harder for voters with disabilities and language access barriers to obtain assistance, constrains election workers’ ability to stop harassment by poll watchers, and bans 24-hour and drive-thru voting, among other measures.
Texas legislators also introduced legislation this year that would have provided for the overturning of election results and that explicitly called for third party forensic reviews of the election results.
footnote24_mx02djs
24 Even without authorizing legislation, the secretary of state’s office launched an unnecessary audit into the 2020 election in four Texas counties. Even though routine audits had already occurred, documents published by the secretary of state’s office would allow for a manual count of votes in those counties, as well as an examination of other election records and voter lists.
Wisconsin’s legislature passed two restrictive voting bills this year, which the governor vetoed.
footnote25_zbhtqen
25 Thirteen restrictive bills are carrying over into the 2022 legislative session, and the state has a gubernatorial race next year.
Wisconsin has also initiated an “investigation” into the 2020 election results. The effort lacks transparency, fairness, and credibility, and is being staffed by a well-known partisan operative with a prior history of spreading false claims of election fraud.
Missouri, New Hampshire, and South Carolina have each pre-filed at least one voting bill that would restrict access to the vote, as well as bills that would initiate or allow for partisan reviews of election results in 2022.
footnote26_c2sopbg
26 Missouri also introduced legislation this past session that would have empowered partisan officials to overturn election results.
footnote27_3rqjhp6
27
Florida and Tennessee have each pre-filed bills that would initiate partisan reviews of the 2020 election results in 2022.
footnote28_3kgeek7
28
Looking Back at 2021
Between January 1 and December 7, at least 19 states passed 34 restrictive laws. At the same time, many state legislatures worked to ensure greater voting access. Between January 1 and December 7, at least 25 states enacted 62 expansive laws.
This expansive legislation does not outweigh the impact of the restrictive laws. The expansive and restrictive sets of legislation are primarily passing in different states — 11 states enacted only restrictive laws in 2021, while 17 states enacted only expansive laws. As a result, there is a stark and growing divide in the nation, where access to the right to vote increasingly depends on the state in which a voter happens to reside. That divide only stands to widen next year unless Congress acts.
Restrictive Legislation
Between January 1 and December 7, at least 19 states passed 34 restrictive laws.
footnote29_h4umaxp
29 The restrictive laws make it more difficult for voters to cast mail ballots that count, make in-person voting more difficult by reducing polling place hours and locations, increase voter purges or the risk of faulty voter purges, and criminalize the ordinary, lawful behavior of election officials and other individuals involved in elections.
The state laws restricting voting access are not created equal. Four of the thirty-four laws are mixed, meaning they contain pro-voter policies as well as policies that make voting more difficult (IN S.B. 398, KY H.B. 574, LA H.B. 167, OK H.B. 2663). Other laws are relatively narrow in their scope (e.g., NV S.B. 84, UT H.B. 12). By contrast, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, and Texas enacted omnibus laws that each contain several new restrictive provisions.
footnote30_i7sgttk
30
More than 440 bills with provisions that restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states in the 2021 legislative sessions.
Expansive Legislation
Between January 1 and December 7, 2021, at least 25 states enacted 62 laws with provisions that expand voting access.
footnote31_gwqoglt
31 These expansive policies ease the processes for requesting and casting a mail ballot and having that ballot counted, expand early voting time periods, improve access for disabled voters, strengthen language access provisions, expand or implement automatic voter registration, and restore voting rights to formerly incarcerated people, among other measures. More than 1,000 bills with expansive provisions have been introduced in 49 states in the 2021 legislative sessions.
CORRECTION: The number of pre-filed bills that would allow for partisan reviews was updated from six to seven on Dec. 21, 2021. The number of pre-filed bills that would allow for partisan reviews of the 2020 election was updated from four to five on Dec. 21, 2021.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/voting-laws-roundup-december-2021
Filtered for having a McDonalds attitude.
This isnt about what you want, shill.
Fuck you.
Learn to speak for yourself, alone.
For notables
>>15353028, >>15353032, >>15353033, >>15353034, >>15353037, >>15353038
Voting Laws Roundup: December 2021
For Notables
>>15352904, >>15352907, >>15352914 Project Veritas Obtains Hidden Military Documents Showing NIH Intent to Create SARS-CoV-2, Using Gain of Function Research
Notable
>>15352947 Big Government & Big Pharma link between catastrophic mercury/aluminum in child vaccines causing autism since 2005 and they covered it up, Jenny McCarthy Was Always Right
Getting sunshine and fresh air is most beneficial, anon… its not all about pills and potions
Of Course.
If I had someone that was as into me, as you are into her…
All the pain of every past would dissolve into peace resolved.
War would be finally over.
Love wins.
A riveting account of the HOAX that sent a presidential campaign chairman to solitary confinement because he wouldn’t turn against the President of the United States.
The chief weapon deployed by the government-corporate-media Establishment against the Trump presidency was propaganda. Time and again, allegations from anonymous sources were disseminated by a partisan media, promoted by a dishonest Democrat Party leadership, and ultimately debunked when the facts surfaced. But by the time the truth came out, it was too late. There had already been casualties.
One of the highest profile casualties was Paul Manafort.
Desperate to defeat Donald Trump—or hamper his presidency after he won—Democrats and their Establishment allies colluded with foreign operatives to concoct a completely false narrative about Paul’s supposed conspiracy with pro-Russian elements in Ukraine to further Vladimir Putin’s efforts to influence the 2016 presidential election. But it wasn’t just defamation of Paul’s character. They took the unprecedented step of enlisting the US intelligence and law enforcement communities in using their power against President Trump and his campaign team.
Political Prisoner finally exposes the lies left unchallenged by media who pronounced Paul guilty long before his case ever saw the inside of a courtroom. Not only is it untrue that Victor Yanukovych or any of Paul’s clients were “pro-Putin,” it is the opposite of the truth. Paul’s work in Ukraine and throughout his career was 100 percent aligned with US interests in the countries he worked in, sometimes even acting as a back channel for the White House itself.
Neither was Paul guilty of laundering money, evading taxes, or deliberately deceiving the US government by failing to register as a foreign agent—which he wasn’t. These were all politically motivated charges manufactured by the Special Counsel’s team for one reason and one reason only: to get Paul to testify against Donald Trump about a conspiracy that never existed. When they hear the basis of these spurious charges, Americans will wonder what country they are living in and what has happened to our system of justice.
Political Prisoner tells the real story of Paul’s life and career, exploding the lies about his work in Ukraine, his previous work with foreign governments and business interests in other countries, his involvement with the Trump campaign, and the “process crimes” for which he was wrongly convicted and sent to prison. It is no exaggeration to say that everything most Americans think they know about Paul Manafort is false.
https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Political-Prisoner/Paul-Manafort/9781510772427
President Donald J. Trump:
“Stacey Abrams helped Biden steal the 2020 Election in Georgia but now she won’t even share a stage with Joe. Stacey knows that Biden actually lost BIG in Georgia, and in the 2020 Presidential Election as a whole, and he’s been so terrible she now wants nothing to do with him. Even the woke, radical left realizes that Joe Biden’s Administration is an embarrassment!”
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Forwarded from
Michael Flynn Jr
1:58
No, Dr Gupta, it shouldn’t surprise you that hospital systems around the country (and the world) haven’t been able to parse out the data of COVID (with) vs COVID (because of).
Hospitals are data driven entities like everyone else.
IF they DIDNT know how to “parse” the data, they were incompetent and had no business being in operation (We obviously know that’s not the case).
That many hospitals got the data wrong? That many DIDNT know how to parse the data effectively enough to show patient deaths w/ COVID vs patience deaths BECAUSE OF COVID?
Bullshit.
And for Tapperto suddenly NOW question the COVID data ONLY because of what the CDC director said this past weekend, is corporate media elitist arrogance at its finest…
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Please take time to read this again.Jake Tapperhas lost all credibility when it comes to speaking truth to power. He is incapable of doing so.==
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/jake-tapper-sold-soul-pharma-rfk-jr/
General Flynn ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Every member of Congress should be calling for his arrest.
https://t.me/s/RealGenFlynn
Liberty Overwatch
Forwarded from
RealDrHarveyRisch
The Murphy DARPA Document, Page 4: "The proposal [EcoHealth Alliance DEFUSE project proposal to create infectious bat vaccine against Coronaviruses, considered GoF] notes that interferon, Remdesivir, and chloroquine phosphate inhibit SARSr-CoV viral replication. Because of its (now) known nature, the SARSr-CoV-WIV's illness is readily resolved with early treatment that inhibits the viral replication that spreads the spike proteins around the body … . Many of the early treatment protocols ignored by the authorities work because they inhibit viral replication or modulate the immune response to the spike proteins, which makes sense within the context of what EcoHealth was creating. … For instance, Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of the illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative)."
This August 2021 document, marked Unclassified, was hidden in a top-secret folder. It smoking-gun acknowledges that HCQ and IVM are valid agents against Covid.
https://assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/2mVob3c1aDd8CNvVnyei6n/95af7dbfd2958d4c2b8494048b4889b5/JAG_Docs_pt1_Og_WATERMARK_OVER_Redacted.pdf
2.0K viewsPatriot,
22:15
Liberty Overwatch
Forwarded from
Pepe Lives Matter 🐸
(Pepe Lives Matter)
Fauci is pretending to be a victim now after funding the virus, silencing the opposition, and hiding the cures.
https://t.me/s/LibertyOverwatchChannel
Jeremy Farrar Email To Collins And Fauci Says He Is Leaning "70:30 or 60:40" Accidental Release Over Natural Event
Inunredacted February 2020 emails between Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar, Dr. Francis Collins, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the three scientists have a "hard time" explaining the furin cleavage site of SARS-CoV-2 and say that it is "highly unlikely" to be of natural origin.
Farrar: "He (Dr. Mike Farzan) is bothered by the furin site and has a hard time explain that as an event outside the lab (though, there are possible ways in nature, but highly unlikely)"
Farrar goes on to say that he is leaning "70:30 or 60:40" that the virus was an accidental release.
While these scientists held the private belief that the lab release was the most likely scenario, they also authored the Proximal Origin paper which worked to seed the natural original narrative for the public.
https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Letter-Re.-Feb-1-Emails-011122.pdf
@KanekoaTheGreat
Don Jr. calls out USA Today for trying to normalize pedophiles.
These people are sick!
Donald Trump Jr.
@DonaldJTrumpJr
The Internet is forever assholes good try on the delete tho!
USA TODAY TRIES TO “UNDERSTAND” PEDOPHILES!!!
To me (and probably anyone who has been watching) this is nothing more than the first step of trying to normalize this kind of behavior. Face with symbols over mouthFace with symbols over mouthFace with symbols over mouth https://twitter.com/usatodaylife/s…
https://mobile.twitter.com/DonaldJTrumpJr/status/1480976148725223424
>>15353330 (You) "A very important read." - President Donald J. Trump
to this
>>15353330 ICYMI: Paul Manafort to Release Book Exposing Political Hoax
>1733f6