>So freedom of speech is limited to what is deemed "good" by the hive mind, and you say everyone's views can be offered?
>But if the majority of the "hive mind" claim it's evil, it's not free speech?
Why are you assuming that in the Hive Mind logic, speech is 'limited' by a 'majority'?
You're describing 51% mob rule not the Hive Mind.
Next post you make, try to refrain from prefacing it with "So…". It indicates a straw man.
Everyone is included != Every idea is correct and consistent with reality.
Learn the definition of 'oxymoron'.
No censorship WHERE?
Like, you're claiming to be a 'victim' of rights violation if you are given a choice by a home owner to refrain from swearing in front of their young children or else leave and speak those words elsewhere?
Censorship as a word by itself is utterly meaningless unless there is a clearly understood context.