Anonymous ID: 2271b0 Jan. 13, 2022, 12:51 a.m. No.15363661   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3664 >>3666

>>15363595

>in the sixties, one parent could support their family of 4-6 on a single income, the other parent could stay home to raise the children and handle the domestic work, in particular, cooking decent healthy wholesome meals to maintain good health and strong immune systems.

 

And thenโ€ฆโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 2271b0 Jan. 13, 2022, 1:32 a.m. No.15363732   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3742 >>3822

>>15363721

The only way your scenario works is if all the reports about mandatory jabs in the military are false. I live not far from the biggest foreign U.S. Army air base in the world. From what I hear, they are ALL getting jabbed, ALL drinking the fucking Kool Aid, and anybody refusing to do so is getting less than honorably discharged, if not worse repercussions.

Anonymous ID: 2271b0 Jan. 13, 2022, 1:42 a.m. No.15363748   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3757 >>3822

>>15363742

>You cannot base everything off a singe event in this though. Did the military say "you get this or you die!"?

 

>No. FREE WILL.

 

Enough hairsplitting and dodging the point. How is it that a military that presents "the only way forward" oppresses its personnel with a mandatory jab policy, and loses a substantial percentage of its forces as a result? It doesn't make any sense. I don't give a fuck about free will arguments. Why would a military functioning for us and not the enemy chop off its own dick that way?

Anonymous ID: 2271b0 Jan. 13, 2022, 2:20 a.m. No.15363837   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3844

>>15363783

>If it were ME.. I would leave the military.

 

As would I. But again, this entirely misses my point. I am asking how such a military as forces its personnel to leave could possibly fit into a reality model in which "the only way forward is the military". That kind of military cannot BE a way forward, because it is self-destructive. If you don't get this by now, I don't know what else to say.