>Ok faggot. Q proofs don’t just magically come together because a few words in a drop (not even on the same date) match the words in a news article tweet.
"A few words".
Those are TWO OF THE MOST POLITICALLY POWERFUL COUNTRIES ON THE PLANET.
Financial Times specifically calling out BOTH Russia AND China accusing THEM of 'psyops' about covid?
Q drop indicating China AND Russia are helping POTUS eliminate the nwo?
Keep dreaming, faggot.
I'll use the phrase 'QProof' no matter how much it angers you.
>If we used that as the basis for proofs we could match any random article with any drop we wanted to
No you couldn't. That isn't how patterns work. It's not merely "words". It's the intention behind them and their significance to real world events.
Q drops that China and Russia are helping to eliminate the nwo.
Financial Times (with George Soros on the cover, I mean open your eyes faggot), accuses those same two countries of 'psyops'.
Don't you SEE the significance of this?
Q proof, and I won't stop saying it just because of some uppity anon with a bug up his arse has an issue with it.
Q proof
Q proof
Q proof