Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 10:45 a.m. No.15366366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6390 >>6732 >>6752

>>15366286

Well, the oldfags no longer here aren't wrong in thinking what's the point of QR without active Q drops.

Especially when the diggs of old no longer occur much any more.

/pol/ is still the place to be for those.

Other than chatting with fellow patriots and using it as a news agg it's not worthwhile for Anons that want moar than that out of it.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 10:48 a.m. No.15366402   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15366291

Re_read drops.

Q went out of his way to head off any future claims of hurr durr it's Q w/o the TC!

Use discernment.

Who benefits from claiming something is from Q team when it's not posted in the way Q said it would?

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 10:58 a.m. No.15366491   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15366383

If you want what to be just a chat room with newsbot articles then nothing has changed.

If you want what to be diggs and Q drops then nothing has changed.

If you want the new Board Admin to not be compd af then stay tuned as only time will tell.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 11:12 a.m. No.15366611   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6711 >>6713 >>6780

>>15366532

For Q not anybody else.

The Whitelist was for Q only as the way to just let him use it.

Otherwise there would have been applications being made for everyone else to use them.

This is revisionist history so you /Comms/ folks can start up the SSDD 2.0.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 11:20 a.m. No.15366693   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15366629

Yes, a Whitelist that only contains Q's TC is what Q wanted the BO to use back in the day.

That way only Q's gets used and all otheres can't and must be Anon.

The only exception being the regular BO/BV ones built into the board's functionality and thus not needing a Whitelist at all.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 11:22 a.m. No.15366716   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6857

>>15366628

Well, they weren't.

Only Q using his TC is a Q post.

Re_read drops where he specifically mentions that in the future shills like babyfist would try to use fuckery to scam Anons.

So, he made it clear that if there's no TC on QR or his board then it isn't from Q.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 11:35 a.m. No.15366828   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>15366711

You know, what's the point?

The institutional memory here is long gone.

And, /Comms/ is already at work setting up the fuckery with nothing to stop them since not enough oldfags remain to put a stop to it this time.

Q prolly ain't dropping here again any time soon and diggs are all done elsewhere and then brought here.

Basically, it's now just a nice place to chat and shitpost still but that's about it.

Truth Social is right around the corner and it's a better avenue for fighting the battles to come once future proves past really ramps up anyways.

Anonymous ID: 84263c Jan. 13, 2022, 11:44 a.m. No.15366911   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6933

>>15366752

>do not rely on Q.

I'd still be mostly on /pol/ instead if it weren't for Q is my point.

And Twatter if they weren't Shut It Down! types.

So, QR w/o Q dropping is not as good as /pol/ + Truth Social will be moving forward.

Others can continue to make their own decisions - I was just saying that many already have in a non Q posting world and that they're not wrong and even astute imo.